User talk:Bop1996: Difference between revisions

m
Text replacement - "‎" to ""
(Undo revision 1563459 by Tag365 (talk))
m (Text replacement - "‎" to "")
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 50: Line 50:
Ok how did [http://www.mariowiki.com/Special:Contributions/GameFreak75 GameFreak75] get duplicated? It looks like they are the same but i don't know how it has been a copy hack and possibly been created? I know this log where you blocked the duplicate account:
Ok how did [http://www.mariowiki.com/Special:Contributions/GameFreak75 GameFreak75] get duplicated? It looks like they are the same but i don't know how it has been a copy hack and possibly been created? I know this log where you blocked the duplicate account:


*12:36, 24 February 2012 Bop1996 (Talk | contribs) blocked GameFreak75 (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of indefinite (account creation disabled) (Sockpuppet of an existing account: Impersonating an administrator)
*12:36, 24 February 2012 Bop1996 (Talk | contribs) blocked GameFreak75 (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of indefinite (account creation disabled) (Sockpuppet of an existing account: Impersonating an administrator)


I can't think of why it is abnormal like that.--[[User:CozmicAlienMickey|Mickey]] 20:59, 29 February 2012 (EST)
I can't think of why it is abnormal like that.--[[User:CozmicAlienMickey|Mickey]] 20:59, 29 February 2012 (EST)
Line 193: Line 193:
::You received a warning for that because it's explicitly spelled out in policy that giving out fake warnings is categorized as abuse of warning privileges, which is considered a warnable offense. Regardless of whether you saw someone else doing it or not, it still broke policy. {{User:Bop1996/sig}}
::You received a warning for that because it's explicitly spelled out in policy that giving out fake warnings is categorized as abuse of warning privileges, which is considered a warnable offense. Regardless of whether you saw someone else doing it or not, it still broke policy. {{User:Bop1996/sig}}


:They broke the policy too. How come they didn't get a warning?[[File:YoshiMP8art.png|30px]] YoshiPickle [[File:ICONYOSHI.png|40px]] 17:07, 5 July 2012 (EDT)
:They broke the policy too. How come they didn't get a warning?[[File:YoshiMP8art.png|30px]] YoshiPickle [[File:MP8 Yoshi Icon.png|40px]] 17:07, 5 July 2012 (EDT)


== Thanks ==
== Thanks ==
:Thanks for removing the warning and I knew I was right. I have a favor to ask. Can you nominate the Bowser Article to become a Featured Article? I would but I don't know how. Thanks in advance.[[File:YoshiMP8art.png|30px]] [[User:YoshiPickle|Yoshi]] [[User talk:YoshiPickle|Pickle]] [[File:ICONYOSHI.png|40px]] 20:25, 6 July 2012 (EDT)
:Thanks for removing the warning and I knew I was right. I have a favor to ask. Can you nominate the Bowser Article to become a Featured Article? I would but I don't know how. Thanks in advance.[[File:YoshiMP8art.png|30px]] [[User:YoshiPickle|Yoshi]] [[User talk:YoshiPickle|Pickle]] [[File:MP8 Yoshi Icon.png|40px]] 20:25, 6 July 2012 (EDT)
:Please?[[File:YoshiMP8art.png|30px]] [[User:YoshiPickle|Yoshi]] [[User talk:YoshiPickle|Pickle]] [[File:ICONYOSHI.png|40px]] 20:43, 6 July 2012 (EDT)
:Please?[[File:YoshiMP8art.png|30px]] [[User:YoshiPickle|Yoshi]] [[User talk:YoshiPickle|Pickle]] [[File:MP8 Yoshi Icon.png|40px]] 20:43, 6 July 2012 (EDT)
:Nevermind I think I did it properly myself, I would appreciate it if you would check it though, just in case I messed up, which I probably did, since I'm not good at a lot of these things.[[File:YoshiMP8art.png|30px]] [[User:YoshiPickle|Yoshi]] [[User talk:YoshiPickle|Pickle]] [[File:ICONYOSHI.png|40px]] 20:58, 6 July 2012 (EDT)
:Nevermind I think I did it properly myself, I would appreciate it if you would check it though, just in case I messed up, which I probably did, since I'm not good at a lot of these things.[[File:YoshiMP8art.png|30px]] [[User:YoshiPickle|Yoshi]] [[User talk:YoshiPickle|Pickle]] [[File:MP8 Yoshi Icon.png|40px]] 20:58, 6 July 2012 (EDT)


== RE:Fake Warnings ==
== RE:Fake Warnings ==