The 'Shroom:Issue LXXIV: Difference between revisions

m
Robot: Automated text replacement (-[[MarioWiki:Empty Section Policy +[[MarioWiki:Empty sections)
m (edit summary removed)
m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-[[MarioWiki:Empty Section Policy +[[MarioWiki:Empty sections))
Line 94: Line 94:
Other than that, we have been working a bit on the Archives and restoring archived issues, doing some things with the sign-ups (getting rid of the unnecessary "Leading Staff" and "Late section" designations), securing the ten 'Shroom Awards that will be in the celebration later this year, and various other projects. We will be doing a lot more of these sorts of things throughout the next few months in order to make the paper more streamlined and easier to access.
Other than that, we have been working a bit on the Archives and restoring archived issues, doing some things with the sign-ups (getting rid of the unnecessary "Leading Staff" and "Late section" designations), securing the ten 'Shroom Awards that will be in the celebration later this year, and various other projects. We will be doing a lot more of these sorts of things throughout the next few months in order to make the paper more streamlined and easier to access.
}}
}}
{{ShroomSection|background=shroomspring|title=The 'Shroom Spotlight|issue=LXXIV|content=Hello readers! YoshiKong here with this month's edition of [[The 'Shroom:Spotlight|'Shroom Spotlight]]. So [[The 'Shroom:Issue LXXIII/The 'Shroom Spotlight|last month]], we had our first 'Shroom Spotlight section in years. The section's focus was to help improve the ''[[Mario & Luigi: Superstar Saga]]'' article, which was nominated to be [[MarioWiki:Featured Articles/Unfeature/N1/Mario & Luigi: Superstar Saga|unfeatured]] back in March this year, due to the article not reflecting [[MarioWiki:Featured Articles|Featured Article]] standards. Some of the main issues with the article were: the brief opening paragraph, the overly long Story section, and the empty sections, which needed to be filled as per [[MarioWiki:Empty Section Policy|policy]]. Throughout the month, we were able to take care of two of these three problems with the article, as recorded <span class="plainlinks">[http://www.marioboards.com/index.php?topic=24588.msg1106674#msg1106674 here]</span>. However, we do need more contributors to the project. If you are interested, then please read on!
{{ShroomSection|background=shroomspring|title=The 'Shroom Spotlight|issue=LXXIV|content=Hello readers! YoshiKong here with this month's edition of [[The 'Shroom:Spotlight|'Shroom Spotlight]]. So [[The 'Shroom:Issue LXXIII/The 'Shroom Spotlight|last month]], we had our first 'Shroom Spotlight section in years. The section's focus was to help improve the ''[[Mario & Luigi: Superstar Saga]]'' article, which was nominated to be [[MarioWiki:Featured Articles/Unfeature/N1/Mario & Luigi: Superstar Saga|unfeatured]] back in March this year, due to the article not reflecting [[MarioWiki:Featured Articles|Featured Article]] standards. Some of the main issues with the article were: the brief opening paragraph, the overly long Story section, and the empty sections, which needed to be filled as per [[MarioWiki:Empty sections|policy]]. Throughout the month, we were able to take care of two of these three problems with the article, as recorded <span class="plainlinks">[http://www.marioboards.com/index.php?topic=24588.msg1106674#msg1106674 here]</span>. However, we do need more contributors to the project. If you are interested, then please read on!


For this month's issue of The 'Shroom Spotlight, we're going to have one page from each improvement category, so there's more variety with what users can choose to help out with. The articles are as follows:
For this month's issue of The 'Shroom Spotlight, we're going to have one page from each improvement category, so there's more variety with what users can choose to help out with. The articles are as follows: