384,644
edits
m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-articleabout +about)) |
|||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
::would be great and not too much. {{User:Banon/sig}} 06:52, 10 November 2012 (EST) | ::would be great and not too much. {{User:Banon/sig}} 06:52, 10 November 2012 (EST) | ||
:::There is already an {{tem| | :::There is already an {{tem|about}} at the top, but perhaps a ''brief'' section will be okay. | ||
:::{{User:YoshiKong/sig}} 06:57, 10 November 2012 (EST) | :::{{User:YoshiKong/sig}} 06:57, 10 November 2012 (EST) | ||
::::I think that it would be useful to explain why we have two separate articles. Imagine that a random guy want to see the Mario article. And he sees the {{tem| | ::::I think that it would be useful to explain why we have two separate articles. Imagine that a random guy want to see the Mario article. And he sees the {{tem|about}}. He goes to the film character article and then : "Why Mario have two different articles ?". But if you think it is redundant, then I won't do it. {{User:Banon/sig}} 07:05, 10 November 2012 (EST) | ||
:::::I didn't say it was reduntant; in fact go for it. But I'm just saying to keep the section brief. But it may be good to elaborate on what sets these two characters apart. | :::::I didn't say it was reduntant; in fact go for it. But I'm just saying to keep the section brief. But it may be good to elaborate on what sets these two characters apart. |