Talk:Invincible Mario: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
(9 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 47: Line 47:


== Move proposal ==
== Move proposal ==
{{TPP}}
{{SettledTPP}}
 
{{ProposalOutcome|failed|3-10|Don't move Invincible Mario to Invincibility}}
'''Proposer''': {{User|Scarlet Pairo}}<br>
'''Proposer''': {{User|Scarlet Pairo}}<br>
'''Deadline''': November 20, 2021, 23:59 GMT
'''Deadline''': November 20, 2021, 23:59 GMT
Line 79: Line 79:


@Metalex123: A page covering all invincibility-granting forms would only work if none of them were given their own articles, otherwise it's a violation of [[MarioWiki:Once and only once]]. --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 21:34, November 6, 2021 (EDT)
@Metalex123: A page covering all invincibility-granting forms would only work if none of them were given their own articles, otherwise it's a violation of [[MarioWiki:Once and only once]]. --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 21:34, November 6, 2021 (EDT)
== Giving Odyssey's Invincible Mario it's own article? (Cancelled)==
Should we give Odyssey's Invincible Mario it's own article? Well, i think so anyways. Why? Because i think Odyssey's Invincible Mario has enough differences to stand out from normal Invincible Mario to warrant it's own article instead of having no article and only having mentions on other articles and pages like the amiibo article and the Invincible Mario article. Okay sure, i know the form ONLY appeared in Odyssey and is exclusive to Mario amiibos so it's not even available in normal gameplay and also since it has only appeared in one game there isn't a lot of stuff to say in it's hypothetical article, but, i think other power-ups are in similar boats to Odyssey Invincible Mario like Super Yoshi (the form from Yoshi's New Island, not the one from Super Mushrooms) as an example: a form that also only appeared in one game and doesn't have a lot of info, just like Odyssey Invincible Mario. So how about we give Odyssey Invincible Mario some love and give him the article treatment?
(Also the reason this isn't a TPP is because i don't know how to make one yet, and I'm also a little scared to do one since I'm not autoregistered yet, so to not risk anything i decided to not make this a TPP, but if anyone is intressted in making this disscusion into a TPP, feel free to do so.) [[User:Shadic 34|Shadic 34]] ([[User talk:Shadic 34|talk]]) 16:29, January 24, 2022 (EST)
:Although I have never used invincibility in this game myself (since I don't own any amiibo), from looking at the section I can tell that the invincibility is still pretty much the same concept and doesn't need to be split. I doubt there would be a whole lot to put in the article if it was split either. {{User:Swallow/sig}} 16:37, January 24, 2022 (EST)
:Than what about Rainbow Mario? It's the same concept as Invincible Mario yet it has an article but not Odyssey Invincible Mario? I mean... I know Rainbow Mario has more differences than Odyssey Invincible Mario and has appeared in more games but still. [[User:Shadic 34|Shadic 34]] ([[User talk:Shadic 34|talk]]) 16:45, January 24, 2022 (EST)
::Having an actual distinct name for one. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 16:49, January 24, 2022 (EST)
:::Okay so i have concluded that indeed that Odyssey Invincible Mario doesn't need an article and why Rainbow Mario has one:
1. All of the points previously disscused
And 2. Rainbow Mario has a power-up item named the Rainbow Star, while Odyssey Invincible Mario doesn't and the only way to access it IS with amiibos...
So yeah aboard ship this, ummm... "Proposal" is cancelled [[User:Shadic 34|Shadic 34]] ([[User talk:Shadic 34|talk]]) 16:55, January 24, 2022 (EST)
== The Invincible Merge ==
:Can we merge [[Invincible Mario]] with [[Rainbow Mario]]? --{{User:NatsMario2011/sig}} 19:57, April 22, 2022 (EDT)
754

edits