Talk:Ganondorf: Difference between revisions
→Featured Article: new section
m (→SSB4) |
(→Featured Article: new section) |
||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
:Potentially the one from Nintendo, but otherwise, we don't cover leaks, regardless of whether or not they're true. {{User:Time Turner/sig}} | :Potentially the one from Nintendo, but otherwise, we don't cover leaks, regardless of whether or not they're true. {{User:Time Turner/sig}} | ||
::It was discussed on the talk page for SSB4 that we wait for the Japanese release. It's not that far anyway. {{User:Tails777/sig}} | ::It was discussed on the talk page for SSB4 that we wait for the Japanese release. It's not that far anyway. {{User:Tails777/sig}} | ||
== Featured Article == | |||
Okay, I get that due to Smash, it’s reasonable for the page to be here, and sure, it’s well written, but Ganondorf really shouldn’t be the FA on ''MarioWiki''. I’m not demanding it be changed (although I know you guys change your FA like every week) but I just want to know why on earth '''Ganon''' was chosen as your FA. | |||
Also the fact that you change your FA so much makes us a SmashWiki look bad because we only change it every few months. [[Special:Contributions/72.133.91.93|72.133.91.93]] 11:50, 1 October 2018 (EDT)Blueflame105 | |||