8,014
edits
Waluigi Time (talk | contribs) |
m (→Comments) |
||
Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
I think what Mister Wu was getting at was the possibility of giving this Lakitu its own article entirely. Maybe that can be another option? (Also, for future reference, is a new proposal necessary when new info contradicts an old proposal? He was saying that wasn't a hard rule.) [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 13:55, September 20, 2022 (EDT) | I think what Mister Wu was getting at was the possibility of giving this Lakitu its own article entirely. Maybe that can be another option? (Also, for future reference, is a new proposal necessary when new info contradicts an old proposal? He was saying that wasn't a hard rule.) [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 13:55, September 20, 2022 (EDT) | ||
:I could add that, although I'm not sure what title we would use, I don't think there's any official name beyond just "Lakitu" at this point (otherwise we'd probably have a separate article already) so we'd have to go to an identifier. (I don't think we have any set guidelines on that, so I'm not entirely sure, unfortunately.) --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 14:05, September 20, 2022 (EDT) | :I could add that, although I'm not sure what title we would use, I don't think there's any official name beyond just "Lakitu" at this point (otherwise we'd probably have a separate article already) so we'd have to go to an identifier. (I don't think we have any set guidelines on that, so I'm not entirely sure, unfortunately.) --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 14:05, September 20, 2022 (EDT) | ||
::Lakitu (referee) could work (I'd support that option). {{User:Hewer/sig}} 14:17, September 20, 2022 (EDT) |
edits