14,113
edits
MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/27: Difference between revisions
Passed!
Reddragon19k (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Reddragon19k (talk | contribs) (Passed!) |
||
| Line 1,096: | Line 1,096: | ||
'''Toad85:''' While ''[[Donkey Kong Original Edition]]'' can be deleted, ''[[Super Mario Bros. Deluxe]]'' should be left alone because it is more than a remake, as it includes both ''SMB'' and ''[[Super Mario Bros.: The Lost Levels]]'', as well as a handful of new features. Similarly, we have an article for ''[[Super Mario All-Stars]]'', since it's a collection of four games and can't be placed on any one of the originals' articles, nor split amongst them as that leads to repetitive and/or fragmented coverage of the compilation game. - {{User|Walkazo}} | '''Toad85:''' While ''[[Donkey Kong Original Edition]]'' can be deleted, ''[[Super Mario Bros. Deluxe]]'' should be left alone because it is more than a remake, as it includes both ''SMB'' and ''[[Super Mario Bros.: The Lost Levels]]'', as well as a handful of new features. Similarly, we have an article for ''[[Super Mario All-Stars]]'', since it's a collection of four games and can't be placed on any one of the originals' articles, nor split amongst them as that leads to repetitive and/or fragmented coverage of the compilation game. - {{User|Walkazo}} | ||
}} | |||
===Form Over Sayed=== | |||
<span style="color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS;font-size:150%">LOSE IT 12-0</span> | |||
Almost all the microgame pages from ''[[WarioWare: Smooth Moves]]'' have a section called ''Form''. I think these sections must be delected because the infobox already have the Form description. | |||
{{scrollbox|content= | |||
Proposer: {{User|Goomblob}}<br> | |||
Deadline: August 24, 2011, 23:59 GMT | |||
====Support==== | |||
#{{User|Zero777}} Screw the examples, I looked it up myself to see if he was right and he is. This thing I believe can be swung by the staff, but proposals are good ways. So I find the form section useless also. | |||
#{{user|SWFlash}} per Zero. | |||
#{{User|Walkazo}} - Per Zero777 (and SWFlash's example). | |||
#{{User|Goomba's Shoe15}} Per Zero | |||
#{{User|Reddragon19k}} Time to per all and that is that! | |||
#{{User|Jazama}} Per all | |||
#{{User|Baconator}} Sure, per all | |||
#{{User|Lakituthequick}} Useless section, per all | |||
#{{User|Loxo}} Per All | |||
#{{User|Supremo78}} Per Zero. | |||
#{{User|TurniPowerup}} Excellent proposal Goomblob! Why even make a section for 2-4 words? Per all, especially Zero777 and Goomblob. | |||
#{{User|Bowser's luma}} Yes it is quite "over sayed". | |||
====Oppose==== | |||
====Comments==== | |||
I need some more description on why you want to do this to give a vote. {{User|Supremo78}} | |||
You Haven't got enough detail for me to vote. If you add examples Then I could give you a vote {{User|Jman2401}} | |||
:Per Jman2401. I don't even know what "form" means. Elaborate for those who don't have the game. {{User|Toad85}} | |||
Example article: [[Pest Control]]. {{user|SWFlash}} | |||
:Wait a second, but what about the "Forms" article itself? I'm a bit confused here... is that article going to stay (because it's fine as it is). {{User|MeritC}} | |||
::No he's only referring to the forms section in the microgame articles. {{User|Zero777}} | |||
}} | }} | ||