MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/18: Difference between revisions

m
Archiving (I hope I got it right)
m (When it's deleted, the vote tally isn't required.)
m (Archiving (I hope I got it right))
Line 1,098: Line 1,098:
@Cobold: According to Rule 10, you only have today to rewrite the proposal. I suggest you delete it for now and recreate the proposal once you've planned everything out.--{{User|Knife}} 19:17, 31 December 2009 (EST)
@Cobold: According to Rule 10, you only have today to rewrite the proposal. I suggest you delete it for now and recreate the proposal once you've planned everything out.--{{User|Knife}} 19:17, 31 December 2009 (EST)
:I agree. {{User|Time Q}}}}
:I agree. {{User|Time Q}}}}
===Split [[:Category:Special Moves]]===
<span style="color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS;font-size:150%">CREATE THE CATEGORY 12-1</span><br>
While patrolling, I found that tehre is no such category as "Moves", so all of the things that will clasify as normal moves, are listed as special, so I propose we choose which from the Special Moves are not special, and are just "moves". <br>
Since when is Jump something special? It is the most common and ordinary thing in the Mario series.<br>
You can post in the comments section which Special MOves you dont think are Special.<br>
For example, some things as the [[Baby Drill]] is special, because it is something that is not commonly done, while something as [[Baby Toss]] simply isn't, because it is just throwing the babies.<br>
How will they be separated? I think that most of the SM are found in RPG's, moves like the Green Shell, Copy FLower, and those. Normal Moves are the ones you can "Normally" do, like jumping, baby tossing, high jumping, perhaps.
{{scroll box|content=
'''Proposer:''' {{user|Tucayo}}<br>
'''Deadline:''' 3 January 2010, 15:00
====Create the Moves category====
#{{user|Tucayo}} - Per me.
#{{User|Cobold}} - I don't consider [[Jump]] to be a "special" move.
#{{User|Fawfulfury65}} Yeah I was just thinking about that category today. Jump isn't a special move at all!
#{{User|Twentytwofiftyseven}} - Per all.
#{{User|Edofenrir}} - I just browsed Category:Special Moves, and there seems to be enough material to warrant the creation of a new Category. When splitting however, please take into account what I said in the comment section.
#{{User|Zero777}} I am Zero! I notice that a few months back I didn't really care, but that is a good idea. Since hen jump considered a special? Zero signing out.
#{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} There's nothing so special about "Jump" and "Gulp" concerning with the main series so why list them under the Special Moves Category? I agree with this proposal, make a normal moves section. Why isn't there a normal moves category yet?
#{{User|Gamefreak75}} Per all.
#{{User|Supermariofan14}} - Per all.
#{{User|Baby Mario Bloops}} - So it would be just '''Moves''' and '''Specials''' (or Special Moves)? That sounds excellent and more organzied than the constuction zone we have now...
#{{User|Stooben Rooben}} &mdash; Per all.
#{{User|MATEOELBACAN}} Per All.
====All moves are special====
#{{User|Fly Guy 2}} I agree completely, but this needs to have 3 or more votes to pass because it has 10 "agree" votes
====Comments====
Please consider that the term "Special Move" comes directly from gameplay jargon and is not determined by how out-of-the-ordinary the action in question is. Wheter something is a normal move or a special move depends on how it is accessed and executed, not what exactly it is. <br>
In an RPG f.e. special moves are those moves that are an alternative to the plain "attack" command. They usually, but not necessarily, consume a certain source of power, like FP. Basically, everything action different from a character's normal way of attack is a special move.
If we split this category into two, then the [[Jump]] you mentioned would be in both categories. It is Mario's normal way of attack in most games, but in SMRPG gameplay, it qualifies as a special move. Because of this ambiguation, I cannot make my decision solely on the base of Jump. Do you have any other examples? - {{User|Edofenrir}}
:I tried to clarify it :) Feel free to comment. And yes, in the way you put it, i think Jump should be in both. {{user|Tucayo}}
::Reading some of the comments above, one has to wonder if anybody actually reads the comment section... - {{User|Edofenrir}}
:::Um...Shy Guy: Why did you vote oppose without a reason except "I fully support"? {{User|Marioguy1}}
I willget to this the 3rd or the 4th, if I cant. [[user:Tucayo]]
::::'''Fly Guy 2''': Proposals with 10 or more votes merely need to pass by a ''margin'' of three - it doesn't mean both sides need at least three votes period. The rule means that a vote of 6-4 couldn't pass (or fail) because it's too close a race - there's only 2 votes separating the two sides; however, 7-4 could pass/fail, because there's a difference of 3. The rule was made for controversial proposals: when you get proposals with over twenty votes, letting them pass by a single vote would be a bad idea, because the community is clearly divided and either outcome would not serve the Wiki; holding out for a difference of three gives us more time to negotiate a solution everyone's happy with. However, ''this'' proposal has a clear majority already, so the rule will not come into play at all when the deadline hits. If you support it, vote "support". - {{User|Walkazo}}}}