MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N2/Mario Super Sluggers: Difference between revisions

m
Archiving.
m (Archiving.)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]===
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]===
{{UNFANOMSTAT
{{UNFANOMFAIL
|nominated=19:33, 28 November 2018 (EST)<!--Sign with FIVE tildes(~) here to put the exact date of the nomination. -->
|nominated=19:33, 28 November 2018 (EST)
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last oppose by copying it from the history of the page.-->
|lastedit=21:39, 23 January 2019
}}
|nosupport=true
}}                        
==== Remove featured article status ====
==== Remove featured article status ====
#{{User|Toadette the Achiever}} Though the rest of the article is a masterpiece, there are two big problems which are glaringly obvious. The first one is especially obnoxious: the "[[Mario Super Sluggers#The "Challenge Mode Cutscenes"|Challenge Mode Cutscenes]]" section. That section is cluttered, with '''way''' too excessive detail{{footnote|main|1}} and littered flowery and/or otherwise unnecessary descriptions{{footnote|main|2}}. That aside, the second problem comes from the reception/sales section; rather, the lack thereof. Yeah. There is literally no critical reception section in the entire article. That being said, I think this article needs to be unfeatured for the problems mentioned.
#{{User|Toadette the Achiever}} Though the rest of the article is a masterpiece, there are two big problems which are glaringly obvious. The first one is especially obnoxious: the "[[Mario Super Sluggers#The "Challenge Mode Cutscenes"|Challenge Mode Cutscenes]]" section. That section is cluttered, with '''way''' too excessive detail{{footnote|main|1}} and littered flowery and/or otherwise unnecessary descriptions{{footnote|main|2}}. That aside, the second problem comes from the reception/sales section; rather, the lack thereof. Yeah. There is literally no critical reception section in the entire article. That being said, I think this article needs to be unfeatured for the problems mentioned.