MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Vivian: Difference between revisions

MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Vivian (edit)

Revision as of 22:01, April 16, 2014

72 bytes added , 10 years ago

→‎Comments

DaisyLuigi

927

edits

Revision as of 20:33, April 16, 2014 (edit) Walkazo (talk \| contribs) (→‎Comments: horrible) ← Older edit		Revision as of 22:01, April 16, 2014 (edit) (undo) DaisyLuigi (talk \| contribs) (→‎Comments) Newer edit →
Line 28:		Line 28:

	:::Removing perfectly good information is a ''horrible'' way to go about "improving" a page. The gender stuff is important and interesting, and at only two paragraphs,it's not too large at all, it's just thorough, which is a good thing. And if anything, the extensive references are one of the page's strengths: citations give the wiki credibility and make us more professional-grade, and in this case in particular, having hard video proof and our own original translation work stops people from baselessly trying to white-wash the gender stuff, since we can say "uh, no, it's real, leave it alone". - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 20:33, 16 April 2014 (EDT)		:::Removing perfectly good information is a ''horrible'' way to go about "improving" a page. The gender stuff is important and interesting, and at only two paragraphs,it's not too large at all, it's just thorough, which is a good thing. And if anything, the extensive references are one of the page's strengths: citations give the wiki credibility and make us more professional-grade, and in this case in particular, having hard video proof and our own original translation work stops people from baselessly trying to white-wash the gender stuff, since we can say "uh, no, it's real, leave it alone". - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 20:33, 16 April 2014 (EDT)
			::::Thanks for clearing that up, I wasn't sure. {{User:DaisyLuigi/sig}}