41,709
edits
MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Bowser: Difference between revisions
m
Porplemontage moved page MarioWiki:Featured Articles/N1/Bowser to MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Bowser: Fix
m (→Support) |
m (Porplemontage moved page MarioWiki:Featured Articles/N1/Bowser to MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Bowser: Fix) |
||
| (15 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== | ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== | ||
{{ | {{FANOMFAIL | ||
|nominated=3:00, 23, | |nominated=3:00, May 23, 2011 (GMT) | ||
| | |lastedit=10:44, April 29, 2012 | ||
}} | |nosupport=false}} | ||
==== Support ==== | ==== Support ==== | ||
#{{User|Catboy41}} Now, I'm new, so maybe I'm not reading the rules correctly, But I am pretty sure I did, so with that in mind, I think that this article Is AWESOME. I was actually suprised It wasn't featured when I joined. I didn't spot any bad templates, and I believe It should be featured. It's written in correct verb tense, as far as I know. It has a lot of info, and I believe It is indeed, one of the best. | #{{User|Catboy41}} Now, I'm new, so maybe I'm not reading the rules correctly, But I am pretty sure I did, so with that in mind, I think that this article Is AWESOME. I was actually suprised It wasn't featured when I joined. I didn't spot any bad templates, and I believe It should be featured. It's written in correct verb tense, as far as I know. It has a lot of info, and I believe It is indeed, one of the best. | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
#{{User|Big Koopa}} | #{{User|Big Koopa}} | ||
#{{User|Mrcrackerpants}} | #{{User|Mrcrackerpants}} | ||
#{{User|Jose17796}} | |||
#{{User|Caf772000}} | |||
#{{User|Cortez}} | |||
#{{User|The legend of zelda rocks}} | |||
#{{User|Smb1}} | |||
==== Oppose ==== | ==== Oppose ==== | ||
| Line 49: | Line 54: | ||
#{{User|Bobosmith01}} There is many mistakes. Als many wrong verbs and there tenses. If it has one of thse bars...... why should it even be thought of nomination? | #{{User|Bobosmith01}} There is many mistakes. Als many wrong verbs and there tenses. If it has one of thse bars...... why should it even be thought of nomination? | ||
#{{User|KS3}} Is is just me, or do I see two rewrite templates at the top of the page? The Mario Party section also needs expansion. | #{{User|KS3}} Is is just me, or do I see two rewrite templates at the top of the page? The Mario Party section also needs expansion. | ||
#{{User|Commander Code-8}} | #{{User|Commander Code-8}} The way this article orders his biography is rubbish. It's got the main series first, which is right, then it's got all of the cartoon tv series and movies before the major spinoff series'. | ||
#{{User|Spidey665}} '''Strongest Possible Oppose'''. There are wrong verbs and typos on this page, maybe if we'd all get to work on it, it'd help. | #{{User|Spidey665}} '''Strongest Possible Oppose'''. There are wrong verbs and typos on this page, maybe if we'd all get to work on it, it'd help. | ||
#{{User|Enriquevv75}} Per all | #{{User|Enriquevv75}} Per all | ||
#{{User|SuperYoshiBros}} Per DKPetey99 and Goomba's Shoe 15 | #{{User|SuperYoshiBros}} Per DKPetey99 and Goomba's Shoe 15 | ||
#{{User|Propeller Toad}} I'm afraid I'm going to have go with a no here. Aside from the templates and missing sections, Bowser's article also lacks images from most of his appearances (aside from the mainstream Super Mario games). It is crucial to include images in the sections with large amounts of information in order to illustrate Bowser's appearances in these games and media appearances, and by adding this to the fact of the other flaws in this article, I personally do not think Bowser's article is ready to be featured just yet. Essentially per all. | #{{User|Propeller Toad}} I'm afraid I'm going to have go with a no here. Aside from the templates and missing sections, Bowser's article also lacks images from most of his appearances (aside from the mainstream Super Mario games). It is crucial to include images in the sections with large amounts of information in order to illustrate Bowser's appearances in these games and media appearances, and by adding this to the fact of the other flaws in this article, I personally do not think Bowser's article is ready to be featured just yet. Essentially per all. | ||
#{{User|YoshiKong}} | #{{User|YoshiKong}} This is quite a long article, but '''quality, not quantity'''. | ||
#{{User|Super Famicom 64}} …per all… How in the world a guy can nominate an article with so much less information… and with ''' | #{{User|Super Famicom 64}} …per all… How in the world a guy can nominate an article with so much less information… and with '''{{tem|rewrite-expand}}'''?! | ||
#{{User|Kamek126}} I oppose because it's missing data about some of the games and i'm afraid it lacks many images of him from older titles. | #{{User|Kamek126}} I oppose because it's missing data about some of the games and i'm afraid it lacks many images of him from older titles. | ||
#Since Bowser IS the main villain of the Mario series most people would already have seen him I think the spot should go to a lesser know char. so we can keep fans interested in new articles.[[User:The real yoshi]] | |||
==== Removal of Opposes ==== | ==== Removal of Opposes ==== | ||
=====All Opposes===== | =====All Opposes===== | ||
| Line 81: | Line 86: | ||
:I meant to get a ''point'' across, Lost Mini Star09! [[User:MysteryGirl2012|MysteryGirl2012]] | :I meant to get a ''point'' across, Lost Mini Star09! [[User:MysteryGirl2012|MysteryGirl2012]] | ||
Even the Mario page has construction going on. {{User | Even the Mario page has construction going on. {{User|Spidey665}} 17:49, 9 January 2012 (EST) | ||
Do we really need another section for ports or remakes? Unless there are major changes in the remakes, it doesn't need to be here.--[[User:Toadshroom|Toadshroom]] 22:47, 18 February 2012 (EST) | Do we really need another section for ports or remakes? Unless there are major changes in the remakes, it doesn't need to be here.--[[User:Toadshroom|Toadshroom]] 22:47, 18 February 2012 (EST) | ||