Category talk:Glitches: Difference between revisions

Category talk:Glitches (edit)

821 bytes added , 2 years ago

3,783

edits

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{Talk|Navigation template}}
 Can this category get it's own navigation template? See below;
 Beta elements &ndash; {{tem|BetaElements}}<br>
-List of staff &ndash; {{tem|Staff Teams}}<br>
+List of staff &ndash; {{tem|staff}}<br>
 List of quotes &ndash; {{tem|Quotes}}<br>
-List of media &ndash; {{tem|NavMedia}}<br>
+List of media &ndash; {{tem|media nav}}<br>
 List of glitches &ndash; ???
@@ Line 11: / Line 10: @@
 {{User:YoshiKong/sig}} 23:46, 5 November 2012 (EST)
+:I agree ! I don't see why there wouldn't be one. {{User:Banon/sig}} 09:30, 7 November 2012 (EST)
+::Yeah, it should get a template: not having one is an inconsistent oversight, for sure. Go ahead and make it. - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 09:59, 7 November 2012 (EST)
+== Format for Categories ==
+Since the fact that these lists are about glitches is already in the title, why do some list still use "Glitches" for the first category? I understand this choice for shorter lists that have too few entries to require categories, but in general it seems unnecessary. --[[User:Zaku|Zaku]] ([[User talk:Zaku|talk]]) 14:22, March 18, 2022 (EDT)
+:Okay, I went ahead and edited the problematic lists, so that they are less redundant in this issue. Note that I did not touch the lists where "Glitch" is the only category. --{{User:Zaku/sig}} 20:56, March 21, 2022 (EDT)