442
edits
(→Oppose) |
MegaBowser64 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 111: | Line 111: | ||
#{{User|Mario}} Appears that proposal does try to accommodate for reservations we have so I think we're good to go. The example provided by Ahemtoday did push me to support this. | #{{User|Mario}} Appears that proposal does try to accommodate for reservations we have so I think we're good to go. The example provided by Ahemtoday did push me to support this. | ||
#{{User|Hooded Pitohui}} Per proposal and per Glowsquid in particular. I'm a preservationist at heart, and I do like the idea of having all of these assets ''somewhere'', but Glowsquid has a point that a textual list doesn't lose relevant information here. | #{{User|Hooded Pitohui}} Per proposal and per Glowsquid in particular. I'm a preservationist at heart, and I do like the idea of having all of these assets ''somewhere'', but Glowsquid has a point that a textual list doesn't lose relevant information here. | ||
{{User|MegaBowser64}} Per all. | |||
<s>#{{User|Camwoodstock}} Per proposal--these icons are already on the tour articles where they're relevant, so having all of these variations on the courses' galleries is a bit overkill. It'd be one thing if they were in a gallery subpage, but just on the articles itself...?</s> | <s>#{{User|Camwoodstock}} Per proposal--these icons are already on the tour articles where they're relevant, so having all of these variations on the courses' galleries is a bit overkill. It'd be one thing if they were in a gallery subpage, but just on the articles itself...?</s> | ||
edits