9,447
edits
Line 250: | Line 250: | ||
Yeah, my point is, Frost Piranhas and Ice Piranhas look and act so dang different from each other that there's really no point in trying to merge them aside from renaming this to Frost Piranha (NSMB) or something based off of the Mario Portal. [[User:PrincessPeachFan|PrincessPeachFan]] ([[User talk:PrincessPeachFan|talk]]) 12:48, May 1, 2023 (EDT) | Yeah, my point is, Frost Piranhas and Ice Piranhas look and act so dang different from each other that there's really no point in trying to merge them aside from renaming this to Frost Piranha (NSMB) or something based off of the Mario Portal. [[User:PrincessPeachFan|PrincessPeachFan]] ([[User talk:PrincessPeachFan|talk]]) 12:48, May 1, 2023 (EDT) | ||
:At this point, this debate is just going to go in circles. {{User:Swallow/sig}} 13:06, May 1, 2023 (EDT) | :At this point, this debate is just going to go in circles. {{User:Swallow/sig}} 13:06, May 1, 2023 (EDT) | ||
: | :I concur with Swallow here: We ''know'' your point already, PrincessPeachFan. You keep repeating the exact same argument of "their looks and attack are 'completely' different", and most of the support has countered said argument with the exact same argument of their own (e.g. it's basically a palette swap, Fire Piranha Plant also appears in different color schemes, ''Paper Mario'' enemies have different designs in the first place, etc.). There's literally no point in repeating it over and over; it did not convince us to change our view the first time, and it won't convince us to do so the 756th time. You really need to come up with something better if you really want us to sway from our opinion.<br>And if you ''can't'' come up with another argument, maybe it's better to not say anything, than to repeat the same argument that had already been countered. {{User:Arend/sig}} 13:12, May 1, 2023 (EDT) |