3,737
edits
MarioWiki:Proposals: Difference between revisions
m
→Article Expansion Idea (no name yet)
| Line 157: | Line 157: | ||
I think we should just do a case by case basis, like new articles. We ask: "Is there enough for its inclusion?" There's no way to prevent someone from creating categories - we just have to decide if they are needed when it happens. I don't think this proposal can do much, so I am not voting either way. -- [[User: Son of Suns|Son of Suns]] | I think we should just do a case by case basis, like new articles. We ask: "Is there enough for its inclusion?" There's no way to prevent someone from creating categories - we just have to decide if they are needed when it happens. I don't think this proposal can do much, so I am not voting either way. -- [[User: Son of Suns|Son of Suns]] | ||
=== | ===Improvement Drive Idea=== | ||
I think we should have a project similar to Featured Articles and the Pipe Plaza, where, instead of pointing out the '''best''' articles, we point out the ones that need Work, so users can all work on one project, instead of everyone editing the "featured article" status ones, and leaving articles like [[Doopliss]] un-edited. I know no-one may say yes cause I'm not a sysop or crat or even someone who ''edits'', but I think this would help users. | I think we should have a project similar to Featured Articles and the Pipe Plaza, where, instead of pointing out the '''best''' articles, we point out the ones that need Work, so users can all work on one project, instead of everyone editing the "featured article" status ones, and leaving articles like [[Doopliss]] un-edited. I know no-one may say yes cause I'm not a sysop or crat or even someone who ''edits'', but I think this would help users. | ||