597
edits
White Knight (talk | contribs) |
White Knight (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 133: | Line 133: | ||
:::::Sounds like a good option too. But somehow I doubt people would make use of this. Nobody ever tried to un-feature an article by a proposal - why should they do now? Also, I think having an individual "un-feature process" would be constructive (improvement of the article) rather than destructive (loss of FA status). I explained what I mean by this on Wayoshi's [[User talk:Wayoshi#Un-Featuring Articles|talk page]]. {{User:Time Q/sig}} 06:15, 27 August 2008 (EDT) | :::::Sounds like a good option too. But somehow I doubt people would make use of this. Nobody ever tried to un-feature an article by a proposal - why should they do now? Also, I think having an individual "un-feature process" would be constructive (improvement of the article) rather than destructive (loss of FA status). I explained what I mean by this on Wayoshi's [[User talk:Wayoshi#Un-Featuring Articles|talk page]]. {{User:Time Q/sig}} 06:15, 27 August 2008 (EDT) | ||
::::::That's actually a pretty good idea. {{User:Stooben Rooben/sig}} 17:20, 27 August 2008 (EDT) | ::::::That's actually a pretty good idea. {{User:Stooben Rooben/sig}} 17:20, 27 August 2008 (EDT) | ||
I just want to say that I like Time Q's idea. {{User:White Knight/sig}} | |||
== Waluigi == | == Waluigi == |
edits