MarioWiki talk:Featured articles/Archive 2: Difference between revisions

Line 133: Line 133:
:::::Sounds like a good option too. But somehow I doubt people would make use of this. Nobody ever tried to un-feature an article by a proposal - why should they do now? Also, I think having an individual "un-feature process" would be constructive (improvement of the article) rather than destructive (loss of FA status). I explained what I mean by this on Wayoshi's [[User talk:Wayoshi#Un-Featuring Articles|talk page]]. {{User:Time Q/sig}} 06:15, 27 August 2008 (EDT)
:::::Sounds like a good option too. But somehow I doubt people would make use of this. Nobody ever tried to un-feature an article by a proposal - why should they do now? Also, I think having an individual "un-feature process" would be constructive (improvement of the article) rather than destructive (loss of FA status). I explained what I mean by this on Wayoshi's [[User talk:Wayoshi#Un-Featuring Articles|talk page]]. {{User:Time Q/sig}} 06:15, 27 August 2008 (EDT)
::::::That's actually a pretty good idea. {{User:Stooben Rooben/sig}} 17:20, 27 August 2008 (EDT)
::::::That's actually a pretty good idea. {{User:Stooben Rooben/sig}} 17:20, 27 August 2008 (EDT)
I just want to say that I like Time Q's idea.  {{User:White Knight/sig}}


== Waluigi ==
== Waluigi ==
597

edits