5,258
edits
MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/54: Difference between revisions
Archiving proposal that got yanked before I could vote
(Archiving proposal that got yanked before I could vote) |
|||
| Line 662: | Line 662: | ||
:Yes, ''I'' think that's not enough to warrant a split - that's how opinions work. And I've backed up my opinion with actual relevant examples of naming and splitting policies being applied to such cases, as have several other people in their own dissenting opinions. This is including your constant circular argument of "but da wheels!!1!" and the repeated contesting that those scenario are exactly the same - despite the fact that I and others have repeatedly addressed them and explained how different types of subjects are and have been consistently handled with different types of coverage by the wiki (again, with ''actual'' citations of those examples). Your refusal to acknowledge that or other "inconvenient" facts are in no way evidence of any personal bias on our part, and to accuse others of bad faith at this point is both transparently sanctimonious and inflammatory. --{{User:Lord Grammaticus/sig}} 06:27, October 21, 2019 (EDT) | :Yes, ''I'' think that's not enough to warrant a split - that's how opinions work. And I've backed up my opinion with actual relevant examples of naming and splitting policies being applied to such cases, as have several other people in their own dissenting opinions. This is including your constant circular argument of "but da wheels!!1!" and the repeated contesting that those scenario are exactly the same - despite the fact that I and others have repeatedly addressed them and explained how different types of subjects are and have been consistently handled with different types of coverage by the wiki (again, with ''actual'' citations of those examples). Your refusal to acknowledge that or other "inconvenient" facts are in no way evidence of any personal bias on our part, and to accuse others of bad faith at this point is both transparently sanctimonious and inflammatory. --{{User:Lord Grammaticus/sig}} 06:27, October 21, 2019 (EDT) | ||
::Also, Doc, I understand this is aggravating, and a bit late in the process to give this kind of advice, but try not to get ''too'' heated. --{{User:Lord Grammaticus/sig}} 06:37, October 21, 2019 (EDT) | ::Also, Doc, I understand this is aggravating, and a bit late in the process to give this kind of advice, but try not to get ''too'' heated. --{{User:Lord Grammaticus/sig}} 06:37, October 21, 2019 (EDT) | ||
===Limit content for upcoming games=== | |||
{{ProposalOutcome|cancelled}} | |||
This Wiki really doesn't hold back on spoilers for games that still have yet to come out, even if they're being leaked by people like Prosafiagaming what it seen is added to articles almost immediately which could also heavily spoil games for readers. This is also why I'm not contributing towards anything related to Luigi's Mansion 3 right now. So I think when putting information about games that still are not released officially yet, the only information that should be included are things seen in trailers or revealed by Nintendo themselves, which should hopefully cut back on spoilers and not ruin anyone's experiences with these games too badly, and then go all-out after it has released. | |||
'''Proposer''': {{User|Mario Sakuraba}}<br> | |||
'''Deadline''': November 5, 2019, 23:59 GMT | |||
====Support==== | |||
#{{User|Mario Sakuraba}} I just think even this wiki should be considerate to people who don't want to be spoilt. | |||
#{{User|FanOfYoshi}} It's like spoiling something's name and/or physical appearance via fanart and/or in front of someone even before they could have seen the actual thing. | |||
====Oppose==== | |||
#{{User|Toadette the Achiever}} We will not remove any spoilers, period. | |||
#{{User|TheDarkStar}} - Per my principle of opposing proposals that exist solely to force through a personal opinion and are purely reactive in nature. We will ''not'' remove spoilers. End of story. | |||
#{{User|Trig Jegman}} I feel like this has been explained through proposals before. Almost as though we have already made a judgement call on this. | |||
====Comments==== | |||
[[User:Toadette the Achiever|Toadette the Achiever]] and [[User:TheDarkStar|TheDarkStar]] could you guys at least give a constructive argument or something rather than just saying "we're not removing spoilers"? And [[User:Trig Jegman|Trig Jegman]] where was this explained before? [[User:Mario Sakuraba|Mario Sakuraba]] ([[User Talk:Mario Sakuraba|talk]]) | |||
:[[MarioWiki:Courtesy#Censorship]] explains this nicely. "We're not removing spoilers" is a perfectly good vote reason, as this is a wiki. We don't censor info. {{User:TheDarkStar/sig}} 10:54, October 29, 2019 (EDT) | |||
::It's still coming off as pretty rude, which I really didn't want this to escalate too. [[User:Mario Sakuraba|Mario Sakuraba]] ([[User Talk:Mario Sakuraba|talk]]) 11:00, October 29, 2019 (EDT) | |||
I should also point out that I'm not trying to be "forceful" about this, I'll accept without grudges if this doesn't go through. I at least want you all to be civilised here too. [[User:Mario Sakuraba|Mario Sakuraba]] ([[User Talk:Mario Sakuraba|talk]]) 11:12, October 29, 2019 (EDT) | |||
:And what's to suggest they're being unconstructive and "uncivilised", aside from them perhaps being a bit more blunt than needed in making a valid statement? --{{User:Lord Grammaticus/sig}} 11:21, October 29, 2019 (EDT) | |||