User talk:Megadardery: Difference between revisions

I remember you talking to me about {{tem|image-quality}} usage [[File talk:MKSCCongratsScreen.png|here]]. I now have a [[MarioWiki:Proposals|proposal]] active to address these issues. Please look at it when you have the chance. --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 21:15, 9 April 2016 (EDT)

There has been some on-going talks at [[User talk:Wildgoosespeeder/QualityRequestTypes/sandbox]]. Haven't heard a thing from you (I don't know if are aware of that page). Seems like a few, like me, {{user|RAP}} (on his talk page), and {{user|Bazooka Mario}}), are gravitating towards the native resolution for N64 games because it most accurately depicts the games. HUD elements tend to be pixelated in higher resolutions or filtered (in an ugly way or smoothing out jaggedness filters). Some of the images I am replacing even have emulation mistakes or effects that a real N64 couldn't do (aside from oversized resolutions). The plug-in I use to generate the screenshots is the closest to real hardware that bypasses the conversion from a digital signal (internal resolution) to analog (composite video out). If it makes you feel any better, I haven't touched certain images, such as [[:File:PM Koopa Bros Fortress Exterior.png]] and [[:File:Goomba Village.PNG]]. --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 19:53, 17 April 2016 (EDT)

Hey Mega, it's Baby Luigi again. Can you, by any chance, add alignment parameters to the image map template as switchers? Because for [[Mario_%26_Luigi:_Partners_in_Time#Locations|this section in this article]], aligning [[Template:M&LPIT map|this map template]] to the center is a better way to display the map than the default alignment it has, as it mucks up the gallery, but since the template itself lacks any switchers, I had to resort to using raw coding and modifying the parameters within it so that it centers. {{User:Baby Luigi/sig}} 12:08, 9 May 2016 (EDT)

:I think the underlying problem with {{tem|image-quality}} is the crowding of [[:Category:Images to be reuploaded with higher quality]] is currently experiencing. That seems to be why {{user|Baby Luigi}} and {{user|Bazooka Mario}} tend to remove the tag without satisfying the condition for removal. That's what the discussions at [[User talk:Wildgoosespeeder/QualityRequestTypes/sandbox]] are all about. I mean if we can have {{tem|construction}}, {{tem|rewrite}}, {{tem|rewrite-expand}}, and {{tem|stub}} all dealing with degree of severity of good writing standards missing in articles, I don't see why not try to split up {{tem|image-quality}} into smaller, more manageable groups. The trick is figuring out how to split it up. --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 15:44, 14 May 2016 (EDT)

::::::*[[:File:SMG Dusty Dune Boulder Ring.png|:File:SMG DDG Ring.png]]

::I found some [http://shrines.rpgclassics.com/gc/pm2/tattle.shtml better] [http://www.romhacking.net/documents/680/ sources] and updated all of the wiki's PMTTYD tattles according to them, except the Glitz Pit fighter team pages which I didn't touch. I'm not sure whether restating the stats of the individual enemies on Glitz Pit fighter team pages run afoul of [[SMW:ONCE]]. By the way, somehow [[Fuzzy Horde]] is missing in the bestiary since it doesn't have an entry in the in-game tattle log. {{User:A gossip-loving Toad/sig}}  05:41, 18 August 2016 (EDT)