Talk:Birdo/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Line 342: Line 342:
Hey, calm down, FD. Is there not a Gender Controversy section? That's good enough, and you can expand from that. Just referring to Birdo as an "It" throughout the article with the gender information in said section is decent enough. No need to pick on other Users who don't share your opinion. {{User:Pokemon DP/sig}}
Hey, calm down, FD. Is there not a Gender Controversy section? That's good enough, and you can expand from that. Just referring to Birdo as an "It" throughout the article with the gender information in said section is decent enough. No need to pick on other Users who don't share your opinion. {{User:Pokemon DP/sig}}
:The point of having that paragraph was to explain why Birdo was being referred to as she throughout the article. Adding it to another section wouldn't change anything as someone *cough* would still be determined to remove/change it. {{User|ForeverDaisy09}}
:The point of having that paragraph was to explain why Birdo was being referred to as she throughout the article. Adding it to another section wouldn't change anything as someone *cough* would still be determined to remove/change it. {{User|ForeverDaisy09}}
FD, you do realize that if you didn't say things like "someone *cough* would still be determined to remove/change it" you might get people to agree with you, yes?  Here's the facts: Nintendo most recently refers to Birdo as, "it" in Super Smash Bros. Brawl. {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 11:04, 13 June 2008 (EDT)