Template talk:MK race courses: Difference between revisions

Template talk:MK race courses (edit)

Revision as of 11:11, June 1, 2022

544 bytes added , 2 years ago

m

Text replacement - "<span style="color:red;font-family:Comic Sans MS;font-size:150%">([^<\n]+)<\/span>" to "{{ProposalOutcome|red|$1}}"

PorpleBot

Bots, Proprietor

392,553

edits

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{partofpipe|image=[[Image:MKDS_art small.jpg]]|type=template|name=Mario Kart|goal=create race & battle course articles and expand on the [[Mario Kart Series]] game pages}}
 I'm not sure if this is possible but could lines be added to seperate the courses from the different games. I feel the template is a little too chaotic now... -- [[User: Son of Suns|Son of Suns]]
 :But they're all lined up perfectly by column. What seems chaotic to you? <span style="font-family:Kunstler Script; color:#006633;"><font size="5">'''[[User:Wayoshi|W]]'''ayoshi</font></span><small> ( [[User talk:Wayoshi|T]]<tt>&middot;</tt>[[Special:Contributions/Wayoshi|C]]<tt>&middot;</tt>[[Special:Emailuser/Wayoshi|@]] )</small> 17:16, 17 September 2006 (EDT)
@@ Line 19: / Line 17: @@
 I think we should have one tracks template for each game instead of trying to fit all the tracks on one huge template. And the courses with the same name over a few games (i.e. Rainbow Road) could get their own articles for each version. --<span style=" -variant: small-caps;">'''[[User:Porplemontage|Steve]]''' (''[[User talk:Porplemontage|talk]]'')</span> 16:31, 23 October 2006 (EDT)
+'
 ==Usage in articles==
 A lot of articles work with templates listing courses in their corresponding game (see [[Royal Raceway]], Template:Mario Kart 64 Courses). Shouldn't this template be used there instead? [[User:Cobold|Cobold]] 09:00, 4 February 2007 (EST)
@@ Line 47: / Line 45: @@
 ==Sort by cup==
-{{TPP}}
+{{SettledTPP}}
+{{ProposalOutcome|red|Sort by alphabet 4-10}}
 :'''''Draft:''' [[User:Lakituthequick/Draft#Talk Page Proposal on Template:Racecourses]]
 I think the courses should be sorted on cup, not on alphabet.
@@ Line 56: / Line 55: @@
 ===Sort by cup===
 #{{User|Lakituthequick}} Per myself
-#{{User|Reddragon19k}} Sorting... Per Lakitu! '''''YES!!'''''
 #{{User|Tails777}} Per all. It makes it easier to use.
 #{{User|Bowser's luma}} Per all, it would make it much more nice looking and easier to use.
+#{{User|Toad85}} You have my support, but only if you do the same for every other Mario spin-off game that has cups (i.e. Mario Strikers Charged).
 ===Sort on alphabet===
@@ Line 64: / Line 63: @@
 #{{User|Walkazo}} - The game templates already organize the courses by cup, so having this template go in alphabetical order gives readers more options when trying to sort through the links. Plus, cups are important to the games they're in, but this template isn't for the games, it's for navigating the courses across the entire series, in which case, alphabetical order is actually easier then cups, which shuffle around the themed courses, while their names often stay similar (i.e. the DK course is in the Special cup in MK64, Star cup in MKDD, and Flower cup in MKWii - it's much easier to find it each time by looking for the Ds, rather than sifting through all the cups).
 #{{User|Mario Bros.!}} All of the templates are alphabetical...
+#{{User|MrConcreteDonkey}} - Per all.
+#{{User|Fawfulfury65}} I agree with Walkazo.
+#{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} For people who haven't played the Mario Kart games, but are curious, alphabetical is easier. Heck, even for me, memorizing the course's names than the order of the cup they appear in is easier for me. Per all too.
+#{{User|Mario4Ever}} Per Bop1996.
+#{{User|Magikrazy51}} Per Mr. 1996 and Ms. Walkazo.
+#{{User|New Super Yoshi}} Per All.
+#{{User|M&SG}} - Seeing as that template covers tracks from every ''Mario Kart'' title, sorting them by alphabet is the better option.
 ===Comments===
 Uhrm...any reasons? {{User:MrConcreteDonkey/sig}} 13:54, 15 September 2011 (EDT)
 :Easier to see in which cup a course is, in Mario Kart games it also isn't sorted alphabetically. {{User:Lakituthequick/sig}} 14:02, 15 September 2011 (EDT)