MarioWiki:Featured articles/N2/Princess Daisy: Difference between revisions

MarioWiki:Featured articles/N2/Princess Daisy (edit)

Revision as of 10:33, September 13, 2021

3,135 bytes added , 2 years ago

m

Text replacement - "Proposals\/Archive[ _]" to "Proposals/Archive/"

PorpleBot

Bots, Proprietor

397,490

edits

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 __NOTOC__
 ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]===
-{{FANOMSTAT
+{{fa-archive}}
-|nominated=13:47 (GMT), 16 November 2013
+'''Princess Daisy''' became a featured article at 13:24, 17 December 2013.
-|passed=
-}}
 ==== Support ====
 #{{User|Ashley anEoTselkie}} It's a good page,with detailed sections. It's very pretty written.I think that if Baby Daisy is featured,Daisy need to be too.
@@ Line 12: / Line 10: @@
 #{{User|LeftyGreenMario}}
 #{{User|Gonzales Kart Inc.}}
+#{{User|RandomDSplayer}}
 ==== Oppose ====
-#{{User|Yoshi876}} Read through the article and did some minor research and it's said that Daisy appears in Super Mario-Kun, and whilst the FA rule of coverage says full isn't needed it does at least need a bit of it, probably talking about her role in the comic.
-#{{User|Randombob-omb4761}} Per Yoshi876.
 ==== Removal of Opposes ====
-#{{User|UhHuhAlrightDaisy}} Removal of the only two because there's no proof anyone has provided on the matter of the subject, so the can't count it against her article when including it would be a form of speculation with nothing to even say. Aka ridiculous oppossals.
 ==== Comments ====
@@ Line 43: / Line 39: @@
 :::@UhHuhDaisy I'm fine with any article being featured as long as it has all the content, and seeing as Daisy does appear in Super Mario-Kun that needs to have some info, I'm fine with what her role is considering that Super Mario Kun is an obscure thing to get. {{User|Yoshi876}}
 ::::But we don't know that she does. There's no proof of it, that's why the info was removed, so your oppose needs to be removed. [[User:UhHuhAlrightDaisy|UhHuhAlrightDaisy]] ([[User talk:UhHuhAlrightDaisy|talk]]) 15:55, 27 November 2013 (EST)
+:::::Three sections up from this comment says she does appear, so my oppose stays. {{User|Yoshi876}}
+::::::Someone on here saying she does appear doesn't make it a fact. Are you trolling right now? [[User:UhHuhAlrightDaisy|UhHuhAlrightDaisy]] ([[User talk:UhHuhAlrightDaisy|talk]]) 15:58, 27 November 2013 (EST)
+:::::::No, but someone on here who possesses volumes does make it fact. {{User|Yoshi876}}
+::::::::I've looked through Super Mario-kun while I didn't look through each comic, I never found her in the many I had. So until they post the proof as opposed to saying they have it it's not a fact which is why your oppose is invalid. [[User:UhHuhAlrightDaisy|UhHuhAlrightDaisy]] ([[User talk:UhHuhAlrightDaisy|talk]]) 16:27, 27 November 2013 (EST)
+:::::::::Well she says she has scans that have her in it, and seeing as Lefty has no reason to lie, especially since she's supporting the nomination I'm heavily inclined to believe her and so my oppose shall stay. {{User|Yoshi876}}
+::::::::::There's no problem, guys. If we can see the scans that have Daisy in it then there is a valid reason to oppose. If we can't, due to lack of evidence, I'm afraid the opposes will go. Let's give it some time, there's no need to rush a nomination. --{{User|Tucayo}}
+:::::::::::The biggest problem is my sharing device that stores the scans somehow stopped working, so I can't access whatever I had. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}}
+:Can you even name what volumes she appears in so others can investigate? [[User:UhHuhAlrightDaisy|UhHuhAlrightDaisy]] ([[User talk:UhHuhAlrightDaisy|talk]]) 12:00, 1 December 2013 (EST)
+On a separate note, why is her relaitonship section a big bunch? Do other character pages do it like this now? [[User:UhHuhAlrightDaisy|UhHuhAlrightDaisy]] ([[User talk:UhHuhAlrightDaisy|talk]]) 12:48, 1 December 2013 (EST)
+:Yeah, there was a [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/36#Trim the Relationship Sections|proposal]] to condense the relationship sections. {{User|Yoshi876}}
+Removal since Lefty is just stalling the nomination. Lefty is stalling these few weeks and will be off the hook since he'll finally have a legit excuse to stall when Christmas week comes.
+Can no one see his filibuster here? Obviously, he could give another user a torrent, but refuses to since he loves to stall.
+if he has time for gameFAQs [which he has been posting on quite often, recently] then it obviously means he is not making this his online priority and is thus stalling a proposal to make it null and void.
+As such, a time limit shall be given to him as VP. The time limit is by next Friday, December 13. If no such evidence is presented, opposals shall accordingly be removed to progress Daisy's nomination.{{unsigned|84.109.160.122}}
+:Since when do you decide what happens? Lefty isn't the only person who can go out and find these things. {{User|Yoshi876}}
+::I don't know how much ti matters that you're still opposing anyway, doesn't the majority rule in these? Still, like I said I've looked very hard for her appearance in Super Mario Kun and I've never found anything. I've seen her in other MArio comics from Japan, but not Super Mario Kun. No one's providing anything on it so I honestly think people just assume she's in them since logically she should, but I don't think she is. [[User:UhHuhAlrightDaisy|UhHuhAlrightDaisy]] ([[User talk:UhHuhAlrightDaisy|talk]]) 12:04, 7 December 2013 (EST)
+:::Nah, you're thinking about proposals. With nominations, you need at least five supports and no opposes for the article to be legible for featuring, and even then it takes one week for the article to get featured once that requirement is met. {{User|Icemario11}}