94,025
edits
Talk:Noki: Difference between revisions
→Comments
LinkTheLefty (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
::::::These NPCs, while named, <u>'''do not do anything of note,'''</u> and simply say "Hello Mario I'm so-and-so and this is a ride". I fail to see why such minor characters should be split, especially since they weren't mentioned here until the wonderful Encyclopedia mentioned them, of course messing up the name. {{User:TheDarkStar/sig}} 10:25, August 16, 2019 (EDT) | ::::::These NPCs, while named, <u>'''do not do anything of note,'''</u> and simply say "Hello Mario I'm so-and-so and this is a ride". I fail to see why such minor characters should be split, especially since they weren't mentioned here until the wonderful Encyclopedia mentioned them, of course messing up the name. {{User:TheDarkStar/sig}} 10:25, August 16, 2019 (EDT) | ||
:::::::You could say that about many, many, npcs in RPGs. Just because they were not mentioned here until the book did doesn't mean they are not worthy of an article. We make mistakes too. Again, the Buckies are named characters, and should be covered. {{User:Doomhiker/sig}} 11:11, August 16, 2019 (EDT) | :::::::You could say that about many, many, npcs in RPGs. Just because they were not mentioned here until the book did doesn't mean they are not worthy of an article. We make mistakes too. Again, the Buckies are named characters, and should be covered. {{User:Doomhiker/sig}} 11:11, August 16, 2019 (EDT) | ||
::::::::Agreed with minor RPG characters, and I also want to really emphasize that "the wonderful Encyclopedia" should actually further motivate us to give them an article, given that the book would likely not have referred to them with an incorrect name had we only covered them earlier. [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 11:22, August 16, 2019 (EDT) | |||