649
edits
The 'Shroom talk:Issue 141/Director Election: Difference between revisions
The 'Shroom talk:Issue 141/Director Election (edit)
Revision as of 11:01, January 6, 2019
, 5 years ago→Votes
(Fixing a typo that was pointed out.) |
MeerkatMario (talk | contribs) (→Votes) |
||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
====Votes==== | ====Votes==== | ||
#{{User|Gabumon}} - Both candidates have shown application and interest in the project and its future. The fact that they approached people and asked for feedback on the newsletter before the election even began signals to me that a lot of thought went into this campaign, and I would like to see them get a chance to prove their merit. | #{{User|Gabumon}} - Both candidates have shown application and interest in the project and its future. The fact that they approached people and asked for feedback on the newsletter before the election even began signals to me that a lot of thought went into this campaign, and I would like to see them get a chance to prove their merit. | ||
#{{User|Meta Knight}} - I agree with Edo. Their engagement with the staff prior to the election shows that they put a great deal of effort into planning the campaign, and also that they were well prepared. | #{{User|Meta Knight}} - I agree with Edo. Their engagement with the staff prior to the election shows that they put a great deal of effort into planning the campaign, and also that they were well prepared. | ||
#{{User|MeerkatMario}} - Seems interesting for me. The biggest advantage I see from them is the possibility of guest section submissions from the community. I would love to see how that would work out. Looking forward. | |||
=== {{User|Hooded Pitohui}} / {{User|Fun With Despair}} === | === {{User|Hooded Pitohui}} / {{User|Fun With Despair}} === | ||