MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Donkey Kong Land: Difference between revisions

m
no edit summary
(Switching sides)
mNo edit summary
(9 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]===
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]===
{{UNFANOMSTAT
{{fa-archive|unfeature=yes}}
|nominated= 15:00, 30 July 2014
'''Donkey Kong Land''' was nominated to be unfeatured at 03:08, 15 August 2014 and passed at 22:08, 21 August 2014.
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last opposet  by copying it from the history of the page.-->
}}
==== Remove Featured Article Status ====
==== Remove Featured Article Status ====
#{{User|Randombob-omb4761}} This article needs more images (Just look at the template on the article!), it has 6 missing images.
#{{User|Randombob-omb4761}} This article needs more images (Just look at the template on the article!), it has 6 missing images.
Line 11: Line 9:
#{{User|Vommack}} I thought it was good enough at first, but looking further at the flaws that have been brought up, I've changed my mind. Per BL and Ninelevendo.
#{{User|Vommack}} I thought it was good enough at first, but looking further at the flaws that have been brought up, I've changed my mind. Per BL and Ninelevendo.
#{{User|Tsunami}} OK, when I first opposed, I didn't read the article well. Now, I see that most of the article are '''tables'''. It's a bit like [[List of shops in Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars]], only that it was 100% tables. Those images missing make the article seem really incomplete. When a reader reads this "Featured" Article and sees only a part of the images... well, I would instead watch some videos. Oh, but hold on a second... there wasn't a rule? Yep, a rule that prevents Lakitu to be featured for a long time. Yes, that rule 5: '''''An article must not be tagged with any sort of improvement tag'''''. There is a image requested templat at '''top''' of the article. Technically, I'm switching sides like Vommack did. @Super Radio: Yes, the enemies sections are writed good, only that some images are missing. And the article totally lacks colors...
#{{User|Tsunami}} OK, when I first opposed, I didn't read the article well. Now, I see that most of the article are '''tables'''. It's a bit like [[List of shops in Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars]], only that it was 100% tables. Those images missing make the article seem really incomplete. When a reader reads this "Featured" Article and sees only a part of the images... well, I would instead watch some videos. Oh, but hold on a second... there wasn't a rule? Yep, a rule that prevents Lakitu to be featured for a long time. Yes, that rule 5: '''''An article must not be tagged with any sort of improvement tag'''''. There is a image requested templat at '''top''' of the article. Technically, I'm switching sides like Vommack did. @Super Radio: Yes, the enemies sections are writed good, only that some images are missing. And the article totally lacks colors...
#{{User|3D Player 2004}} per Ninelevendo


==== Keep Featured Article Status ====
==== Keep Featured Article Status ====
#{{user|Super Radio}} People were complaining about unwritten enemy sections. Here's your written sections. This article shall remain featured till the end of all. Capisci?


==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ====
==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ====
'''Tsunami and Super Radio'''
#{{User|Randombob-omb4761}} I actually HAVE more reasons why this should be unfeatured other than the lack of images, some of the sections are too short. And there isn't even a controls section how do you call that good? Also, Super Radio's oppose is silly.
#{{User|Vommack}} While Tsunami at least addresses the images, it ignores the rest of the reasons that have been brought up. Super Radio fails to address ANY of them.


==== Comments ====
==== Comments ====
39,656

edits