39,656
edits
MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Mario Kart Wii: Difference between revisions
MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Mario Kart Wii (edit)
Revision as of 16:54, May 16, 2018
, 6 years agono edit summary
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]=== | ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]=== | ||
{{ | {{fa-archive|unfeature=yes}} | ||
Mario Kart Wii was nominated to be unfeatured at 22:45, 14 February 2017 (EST) and passed at 16:32, 15 February 2017 (EST). | |||
==== Remove featured article status ==== | ==== Remove featured article status ==== | ||
#{{User|Supermariofan67}} - I think this page should be unfeatured because it is poorly-written, has many grammar mistakes, and some parts of it are disorganized. To be featured, it should be of similar quality to the [[Mario Kart 8]] article. | #{{User|Supermariofan67}} - I think this page should be unfeatured because it is poorly-written, has many grammar mistakes, and some parts of it are disorganized. To be featured, it should be of similar quality to the [[Mario Kart 8]] article. | ||
#{{User|Baby Luigi}} Mostly per my comments below. The article still has quite a few problems that is enough to remove its FA status. | #{{User|Baby Luigi}} Mostly per my comments below. The article still has quite a few problems that is enough to remove its FA status. | ||
#{{User|Yoshi the Space Station Manager}} definitely looks like it has lost its feature status. | #{{User|Yoshi the Space Station Manager}} definitely looks like it has lost its feature status. | ||
#{{User|Alex95}} | #{{User|Alex95}} Per all | ||
#{{User|3D Player 2010}} per all | #{{User|3D Player 2010}} per all | ||
| Line 28: | Line 26: | ||
I don't see the "poorly written" nor "many grammar mistakes" complaint though. It's probably being nitpicky at this point. {{User:Baby Luigi/sig}} 00:56, 15 February 2017 (EST) | I don't see the "poorly written" nor "many grammar mistakes" complaint though. It's probably being nitpicky at this point. {{User:Baby Luigi/sig}} 00:56, 15 February 2017 (EST) | ||
@Alex95: That's not a good reason. The user who nominated this added the tag AFTER he nominated the article. You need to look at edit histories for further context. I can easily delete that tag and void your reason. {{User:Baby Luigi/sig}} 16:37, 15 February 2017 (EST) | |||
:I did look at the history, but I guess I'm blind. My bad. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 16:43, 15 February 2017 (EST) | |||