User talk:MeerkatMario: Difference between revisions

m
no edit summary
m (whoops)
mNo edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 51: Line 51:
{{sigfix}}
{{sigfix}}
{{sigbox}}
{{sigbox}}
Your signature needs to fit inside the above box (this also goes for the two themed ones). Another issue is the signatures are in violation of Rule 7 on [[MarioWiki:Signature|signature policy]]. You are only allowed one animated image, or two static images in your signature. Your main one has an animated and a static one, so one of them needs to be removed. Your themed signatures have three static images and one animated one so some of them will also need to be removed. {{User|Yoshi876}}
Your signature needs to fit inside the above box (this also goes for the two themed ones). Another issue is the signatures are in violation of Rule 7 on [[MarioWiki:Signatures|signature policy]]. You are only allowed one animated image, or two static images in your signature. Your main one has an animated and a static one, so one of them needs to be removed. Your themed signatures have three static images and one animated one so some of them will also need to be removed. {{User|Yoshi876}}


:Oh, OK. Fixed it! ;)
:Oh, OK. Fixed it! ;)
Line 142: Line 142:


Regardless of what happens between you and another user, threatening to block them by abusing admin power ([http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Theguyonnookipedia&diff=prev&oldid=1862701 not once], [http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:MeerkatMario&diff=prev&oldid=1862710 but twice]) is completely unacceptable. It's understandable that you might be peeved due to Theguyonnookipedia's actions, but it is extremely important that you settle these matters cordially. It would have been best if you left a simple message explaining that you don't like what he's done and politely asking him not to do that. What you did was not polite in the slightest. If you continue to speak to that user or any other user in such a manner, expect further warnings and potentially a block.
Regardless of what happens between you and another user, threatening to block them by abusing admin power ([http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Theguyonnookipedia&diff=prev&oldid=1862701 not once], [http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:MeerkatMario&diff=prev&oldid=1862710 but twice]) is completely unacceptable. It's understandable that you might be peeved due to Theguyonnookipedia's actions, but it is extremely important that you settle these matters cordially. It would have been best if you left a simple message explaining that you don't like what he's done and politely asking him not to do that. What you did was not polite in the slightest. If you continue to speak to that user or any other user in such a manner, expect further warnings and potentially a block.
{{Unsigned|Time Turner}}


== Re: not proud of you ==
== Re: not proud of you ==
Line 157: Line 158:
==RE: Hey Anton==
==RE: Hey Anton==
It's a ludovico technique thing, albeit used incorrectly but lol.  It's a brainwashing thingie. {{User:Hypnotoad/sig}} 04:03, 30 August 2015 (EDT)
It's a ludovico technique thing, albeit used incorrectly but lol.  It's a brainwashing thingie. {{User:Hypnotoad/sig}} 04:03, 30 August 2015 (EDT)
==RE: Fake News questions==
I'll be sure to answer those in my next issue, which will be June because I'm not going bi-monthly.  Thanks! {{User:Hypnotoad/sig}} 23:15, 19 April 2017 (EDT)
== RE:The 'Shroom Spotlight request ==
Hi! Thanks for the requests, they won't make it into next issue, as that is going to be Wario themed. Also, typically we only have one of each improvement tag featured for the issue, however, I will do my best to make sure that these articles are all highlighted in future editions of Spotlight. {{User|Yoshi876}}