MarioWiki:Featured articles/N2/Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door: Difference between revisions

m
 
(12 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]===
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]===
{{FANOMSTAT
{{FANOMFAIL
|nominated=10:27, 28 November 2012 (EST)
|nominated=10:27, 28 November 2012 (EST)
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2012) of the fifth support/removal of last oppose by copying it from the history of the page.-->
|lastedit=15:27, 27 January 2013
|nosupport=true
}}
}}
==== Support ====
==== Support ====
#{{User|Megadardery}} This Article is very clean and very good.
#{{User|Megadardery}} This Article is very clean and very good
#{{user|New Super Yoshi}}
#{{user|New Super Yoshi}}
#{{User|Super Candy}}  
#{{User|Super Candy}}  
#{{User|Kelton2}}  
#{{User|Kelton2}}  
#{{User|Electrical Bowser jr.}}  
#{{User|Electrical Bowser jr.}}  
#{{User|Mariobros1985}}
#{{User|SmartYoshi}}
#{{User|SmartYoshi}}
#{{User|SmashFan}}
#{{User|SmashFan}}
#{{User|SombreroGuy}} This article has all necessary information from the game.
#{{User|SombreroGuy}}
#{{User|Daisyluva99}}
#{{User|Daisyluva99}}
#{{User|CoolJosh2002}}
#{{User|Shroobtimetraveller}}
#{{User|Ilikescrews}}
#{{User|Freakworld}}


==== Oppose ====
==== Oppose ====
Line 36: Line 41:
could easily be shortened to two or three instances without losing any plot-relevant informations, this also applies to most of the rest. In that respect, your edits don't improve that problem and infact makes thing marginally worse.
could easily be shortened to two or three instances without losing any plot-relevant informations, this also applies to most of the rest. In that respect, your edits don't improve that problem and infact makes thing marginally worse.


However, I do think there'd be some merit to having a separate page (which admitelly, might contradict what [[MarioWiki:Subpages Policy]] says about pages being "not just as an extension of an existing page " - but this can be talked about later) for a reasonably well-written chapter-by-chapter summary, as the chapters in the Paper Mario series are essentialy self-contained stories in themselves. This'd leave the main TTYD page with an actual plot ''summary'', and then I might get behind this nomination- but with the plot summary as it is right now, yeah no. ----{{User|Glowsquid}} 12:43, 2 December 2012 (EST)
However, I do think there'd be some merit to having a separate page (which admitelly, might contradict what [[MarioWiki:Subpages]] says about pages being "not just as an extension of an existing page " - but this can be talked about later) for a reasonably well-written chapter-by-chapter summary, as the chapters in the Paper Mario series are essentialy self-contained stories in themselves. This'd leave the main TTYD page with an actual plot ''summary'', and then I might get behind this nomination- but with the plot summary as it is right now, yeah no. ----{{User|Glowsquid}} 12:43, 2 December 2012 (EST)
*{{User|Megadardery}} Is this better? I'v been working on it for 3 days..
*{{User|Megadardery}} Is this better? I'v been working on it for 3 days..


Line 53: Line 58:
I scanned the rest of the article and it doesn't look bad at all, though I'll let others evaluate it more indepth. --[[User:Glowsquid|Glowsquid]] ([[User talk:Glowsquid|talk]]) 12:38, 4 December 2012 (EST)
I scanned the rest of the article and it doesn't look bad at all, though I'll let others evaluate it more indepth. --[[User:Glowsquid|Glowsquid]] ([[User talk:Glowsquid|talk]]) 12:38, 4 December 2012 (EST)
:Yeah it looks much better, but I haven't read it in depth yet. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}}
:Yeah it looks much better, but I haven't read it in depth yet. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}}
Looking through, I see a few other areas that could use touching up. Right off the bat, I noticed that the first reference to Koops doesn't feature a link to his page. The passage on the 3 days of excess could use some work too, one sentence looks like it was split into two without the second ever receiving a beginning, instead starting with some extra space and a comma. That paragraph also includes a run-on sentence, excessive use of "and", and a few others. It needs some proofreading. --[[User:Swagner|Swagner]] January 1 2013