User talk:Time Turner/Archive 6: Difference between revisions

Line 592: Line 592:


Hold up, so let me get this straight (because I also noticed you marking another article to become unfeatured). So what you're telling us is that you're sounding the alarm that the Princess Daisy article AND the ''Super Paper Mario'' need MAJOR rewriting?!?!? Because that's what you're trying to have me conclude hence why you and others successfully removed my vote on the Princess Daisy case (of course, the other person who got his vote removed I can fully understand because as I stated in that reasoning, it wasn't valid at all coming from him). --M. C. - "Mario Gals" Fan! [[User:MeritC|User Page]] | [[User_talk:MeritC|Talk Page]] 13:47, 17 February 2013 (EST)
Hold up, so let me get this straight (because I also noticed you marking another article to become unfeatured). So what you're telling us is that you're sounding the alarm that the Princess Daisy article AND the ''Super Paper Mario'' need MAJOR rewriting?!?!? Because that's what you're trying to have me conclude hence why you and others successfully removed my vote on the Princess Daisy case (of course, the other person who got his vote removed I can fully understand because as I stated in that reasoning, it wasn't valid at all coming from him). --M. C. - "Mario Gals" Fan! [[User:MeritC|User Page]] | [[User_talk:MeritC|Talk Page]] 13:47, 17 February 2013 (EST)
==re your edit summary [http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=MarioWiki:Featured_Articles/Unfeature/N/Dimentio&curid=119508&diff=1415000&oldid=1414999&rcid=1525091 here]==
I have no idea what makes that template so fuzzy, either. What I do is copy it from one of the page where it works and manually change the dates. --[[User:Glowsquid|Glowsquid]] ([[User talk:Glowsquid|talk]]) 15:35, 17 February 2013 (EST)