Talk:World 2 (New Super Mario Bros. Wii): Difference between revisions

Talk:World 2 (New Super Mario Bros. Wii) (edit)

Revision as of 22:04, March 15, 2012

No change in size , 12 years ago

no edit summary

Ratfink43

431

edits

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 #{{User|RandomYoshi}} — Inconsistency is always a bad thing, and we really don't need articles pertaining to small issues like individual levels. Also, like Walkazo said: If this idea were to be implemented, then you'd have to create a proposal pertaining to ''all'' of ''New Super Mario Bros. Wii{{'}}s'' worlds. So, in short — per Raven Effect and Walkazo.
 #{{User|Lakituthequick}} Per Raven Effect and Walkazo.
-#{{User|Ratfink43}} I made a proposal like this once. I was told we can not have articles for levels unless they are named more specifically than just their World number and level number. This is why Super Mario World levels and Donkey Kong Country/2/3/Returns levels have their own articles, they have names (Such as Prehistoric Path or Chocolate Island 2)
 #{{User|Super Famicom 64}} We'll end up in a load of new stubs.
 #{{User|M&SG}} - Per all the other opposers.
 #{{User|New Super Yoshi}} - I would really like the SMW levels merged. actually.
 #{{User|Lindsay151}} - Per all.
+#{{User|Ratfink43}} I made a proposal like this once. I was told we can not have articles for levels unless they are named more specifically than just their World number and level number. This is why Super Mario World levels and Donkey Kong Country/2/3/Returns levels have their own articles, they have names (Such as Prehistoric Path or Chocolate Island 2)
 ===Comments===
 @YoshiGo99 the articles wouldn't be stubs if they had all the right information {{User|Raven Effect}}<br>