Template talk:Empty

I know I voted on this when it was created, but it is redundant, unused, unneeded. The issue can be fixed in couple of minutes, it is a waste of time to just add this template. This, however sorta different from trivia, as sometimes the user won't be able to find a good place to place the trivia away from that section.--

06:31, 14 February 2014 (EST)

I've been thinking the exact same, I'm not even sure this has ever actually been used. Yoshi876 (talk)

So should it be deleted?--

06:46, 14 February 2014 (EST)

May as well be. Yoshi876 (talk)

Add an image to the template

This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment.

Current time: Saturday, May 18, 2024, 15:06 GMT

Recently, there has been some talk about adding an image to {{Construction}} (see this link for details). To answer Walkazo's request, I have requested an image be in this template, too. This is how I think the template should be once the image is added:

Proposer: Stonehill (talk)
Deadline: February 9, 2015 at 23:59 GMT.

Support

1. Stonehill (talk) Per proposal and Walkazo's comments in the given TPP link.

Oppose

1. Yoshi876 (talk) Per reasons against the adding of image in the construction template, the current image is sticking out. Also, since its creation this template has never been used, in all honesty I see no reason for it to exist.
2. Aokage (talk) Per Yoshi876.
3. Walkazo (talk) - Per Yoshi876 and myself in both the old and new construction template TPPs, seeing as I am emphatically against arbitrarily pasting ugly images in all our maintenance templates. It's unnecessary, it adds lots of blank space, it's often poorly formatted, no matter what you do it looks worse for some screen resolutions than others (while the plain templates are unoffensive to all), and as this idea shows, the images will often be completely irrelevant to the subject matter, so there's really no good reason for it to be there. If poorly planned and executed embellishments like this is what will result from the floodgates being opened by the construction vote, all the more reason why both TPPs should fail.
4. Time Turner (talk) Per all.
5. Ghost Jam (talk) Per Walkazo. Further comments below.

Comments

Well, first off, Stonehill, the comments of Walkazo's that you're pering are all against adding images to maintenance templates. I also can't find any hit of her requesting to you to make one about adding images anywhere, in fact (currently) the only mention I can find for that is from your own vote. If I'm missing something, point me to it and seeing as she just voted against, I don't think I'm missing anything. Secondly, why? The construction template discussion seems to be missing a crucial element that's not (currently) in this discussion. Namely, why. Don't tell me "this is a good idea", tell me why it's a good idea. Provide an argument for adding the image and then back up your argument with facts and examples. I can't speak for everyone, but I tend to auto-vote no when there is no argument presented. -- Ghost Jam 19:19, 26 January 2015 (EST)