Talk:Puff (species)

Is this page needed, when we also have Ruff Puff already? All family members are listed there as well and they are labelled as Ruff Puff sub-species. - Gabumon^(talk) 13:20, 26 September 2009 (EDT)

Nope, just a wasted space. And also reac the trivia, WTF?--FREAK ~Game Freak~ OUT!

Delete Puff (species)

This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment.

Current time: Tuesday, May 21, 2024, 17:57 GMT

There's no need for this page considering Ruff Puffs are obviously the "primary" species, making this, essentially, a hypothetical parent species.

Proposer: Binarystep (talk)
Deadline: May 29, 2015, 23:59 GMT

Support

1. Binarystep (talk) Per proposal.
2. Magikrazy (talk) What's even the point in keeping it?
3. ShyGuy8 (talk) Per Proposal.
4. Burningdragon25 (talk) That is a must go for this article! Per all!
5. Lumastar (talk) This is a thing?
6. Mario (talk) Yes, this is a hypothetical parent species. No need to create a redundant article when the species is not that expansive and we have the root species.