Talk:Puff (species): Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== Delete Puff (species) == | == Delete Puff (species) == | ||
{{SettledTPP}} | {{SettledTPP}} | ||
{{ProposalOutcome|passed|9-0|Delete}} | |||
There's no need for this page considering [[Ruff Puff]]s are obviously the "primary" species, making this, essentially, a hypothetical parent species. | There's no need for this page considering [[Ruff Puff]]s are obviously the "primary" species, making this, essentially, a hypothetical parent species. | ||
Latest revision as of 19:00, July 16, 2018
Is this page needed, when we also have Ruff Puff already? All family members are listed there as well and they are labelled as Ruff Puff sub-species. - 
Gabumon(talk) 13:20, 26 September 2009 (EDT)
Delete Puff (species)[edit]
|
This talk page proposal has already been settled. Please do not edit any of the sections in the proposal. If you wish to discuss the article, do so in a new header below the proposal. |
Delete 9-0
There's no need for this page considering Ruff Puffs are obviously the "primary" species, making this, essentially, a hypothetical parent species.
Proposer: Binarystep (talk)
Deadline: May 29, 2015, 23:59 GMT
Support[edit]
- Binarystep (talk) Per proposal.
- Magikrazy (talk) What's even the point in keeping it?
- ShyGuy8 (talk) Per Proposal.
- Burningdragon25 (talk) That is a must go for this article! Per all!
- Lumastar (talk) This is a thing?
- Mario (talk) Yes, this is a hypothetical parent species. No need to create a redundant article when the species is not that expansive and we have the root species.
- Walkazo (talk) - Per all. These umbrella species pages in general bug me, seeing as they're actually talking about multiple species, but that's a whole other kettle of fish...
- Baby Luigi (talk) Per Mario and Walkazo
- LudwigVon (talk) Per all.
