|
|
| Line 30: |
Line 30: |
|
| |
|
| ==Cases== | | ==Cases== |
| ===The Chain Chomp===
| | ''None at the moment.'' |
| *[[User_talk:The_Chain_Chomp#Warning]]
| |
|
| |
|
| ====The Chain Chomp====
| |
| *I have one. KP tried to snitch on me by demanding that paralemmy appeal his warning that i gave him not realizing that his warning on baby luigi's page is permanent until baby luigi takes action. So i gave him a last warn for abusing warning privleges, but them KP chimes in and says that I'M abusing it. That should not be the case, and i deserve more leniency because i do not speak english well and I am just a new guy here.
| |
|
| |
| :*KP, snitch is a person who tells on someone for something very minor in hopes of getting them in trouble. I was very annoyed at the time but have calmed down now so hopefully you can understand my remorse and regrets.
| |
|
| |
| ====KP====
| |
| *I do not know the meaning of snitch, nor did I demand that Paralemmy appeal his warning. Making disruptive comments toward other users falls in the level THREE punishments. I was nice for not giving him a last warning. Comments like "You little snitch" are rude and inappropriate and always lead to a warning being issued. I also think that The Chain Chomp's last comment is invalid. New users should follow the policy just like the old ones, and language knowledge does not matter at all.
| |
|
| |
| ----
| |
| ===Baby Luigi===
| |
| *[http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Baby_Luigi&diff=1608028&oldid=1607532 My warning]
| |
| ====Baby Luigi====
| |
| *This is clearly a case of living by the rules rather than learning by them. While it IS true that I swear, I censor ---- like this, you know? This is ----ing going by the rules right? I never EVER type out the words fully because I can't type it out myself. I still don't like swearing too much, but sometimes, the expletive is enough to express my strong feelings. It's in my mind, but I can't type it out. I'm pretty sure "-----ing" the words is fine as no one can see it. Hell, I've seen less lenient swears than me. I'm pretty lenient. With no prior comment to my warning, I think my warning is wholly unfair and undeserved.
| |
|
| |
| ====ParaLemmy1234====
| |
| *[Insert your comments on why reminder/warning was necessary (this section is for the issuer only)]
| |
| ----
| |
|
| |
| ===Mario===
| |
| *[[User talk:Mario#Warning|Mario's warning]]
| |
| ====Mario====
| |
| *ParaLemmy1234 has issued me a warning for "''adding inappropriate messages on article talk pages''". I have no idea how I got this warning, so I rummaged through my [http://www.mariowiki.com/Special:Contributions/Mario contributions], and I guess my little jesting with YoshiKong on [[Talk:Captain Toad]] was the case? Or maybe it was an offhand comment I somehow made 3 years ago? The user hasn't specified, and I don't think I made a single "inappropriate" comment on article talk pages. Even if the warning is valid, ParaLemmy1234 should also consider my contributions, that I'm a good user and '''not''' a blatant vandal. Since that's the case, he should tell me politely (and ''specifying '''specifically''''') instead of jumping in and slapping me with this warning. This warning is as random as lightning and as undeserved like trading stars from landing on a Fortune Space.
| |
|
| |
| ====ParaLemmy1234====
| |
| *[Insert your comments on why reminder/warning was necessary (this section is for the issuer only)]
| |
| ---- | | ---- |
Revision as of 12:50, January 14, 2014
This page is an appeal system for Reminders, Warnings, and Last Warnings. If you feel you have wrongly received a reminder or a warning, follow the instructions below to appeal the reminder/warning to the administrators. Please keep discussions civil.
Archived Appeals can be found here.
This page observes the No-Signature Policy.
Notes
If you feel that you have been wrongfully given a reminder and/or warning, you can have your case heard here. Please read through the "How To" and the "Rules" carefully. Please note that both the users appealing the reminder/warning and the users who issued the reminder/warning are given a chance to present the administrators with reasons to rule in their favor. However, said comments can only be edited once; this will not expand into lengthy, back-and-forth arguments such as the ones found in proposal comments and talk page discussions.
Rules
- Reminders and/or Warnings given by an administrator cannot be appealed.
- No case can be heard more than once. Once a decision is made, that decision is final.
- If the reminder or warning you issued is overturned, do not re-add it, or it will be removed immediately, and you may be reprimanded yourself if the administrators feel it is necessary.
How-to
This is an example of what your appeal should look like; improperly formatted appeals will be deleted. If you are inexperienced or unsure how to set up this format, simply copy the following template and paste it into the fitting section. Then replace the "[subject]" variables (including the squared brackets) with information to customize your proposal.
===[Your username here]===
*[Insert link to reminder/warning from your talk page]
====[Your username here]====
*[Insert your comments on why the reminder/warning was unnecessary]
====[The issuer of the warning's Username here]====
*[Insert your comments on why reminder/warning was necessary (this section is for the issuer only)]
----
Important: After posting your appeal, make sure that you use {{AppealNotice}} to inform the issuer that his or her warning/reminder is under dispute.
Cases
None at the moment.
