MarioWiki:Featured articles/N2/Mario Hoops 3-on-3: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "__NOTOC__ ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== {{FANOMSTAT |nominated=<!--Time nominated.--> |passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2012) of...")
 
Line 6: Line 6:
}}
}}
==== Support ====
==== Support ====
#{{User|DKPetey99}} This article covers everything about the game. The character list looks nice, as well as the charts of different balls and items. It covers everything from the practice mode and for the other challenges. The article is also written very well and there are no templates for rewrites, construction, etc.I believe the state of this article reflects one of the best the Wiki has to offer, and deserves to be featured.  
#{{User|DKPetey99}} This article covers everything about the game. The character list looks nice, as well as the charts of different balls and items. It covers everything from the practice mode and for the other challenges. The article is also written very well and there are no templates for rewrites, construction, etc.I believe the state of this article reflects one of the best the Wiki has to offer, and deserves to be featured.
#{{User|Lcrossmk8}} Yeah, I'm with Pete on this one. There are no construction or rewrite templates anywhere, and every part of the article is well-written, concise, clear, and pays strong attention to detail. This article most definitely deserves to be a featured article.


==== Oppose ====
==== Oppose ====

Revision as of 21:01, December 23, 2017

Mario Hoops 3-on-3

Support

  1. DKPetey99 (talk) This article covers everything about the game. The character list looks nice, as well as the charts of different balls and items. It covers everything from the practice mode and for the other challenges. The article is also written very well and there are no templates for rewrites, construction, etc.I believe the state of this article reflects one of the best the Wiki has to offer, and deserves to be featured.
  2. Lcrossmk8 (talk) Yeah, I'm with Pete on this one. There are no construction or rewrite templates anywhere, and every part of the article is well-written, concise, clear, and pays strong attention to detail. This article most definitely deserves to be a featured article.

Oppose

Removal of opposes

Comments