Template:Proposal: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(this is long)
Line 2: Line 2:
Currently, the rules for removing support votes from unfeature nomination reads:
Currently, the rules for removing support votes from unfeature nomination reads:
<blockquote>Similarly, not only oppose votes, but also support votes can be removed if they are not well-reasoned enough. The agreement of three users, including a sysop, is needed to remove a vote.</blockquote>
<blockquote>Similarly, not only oppose votes, but also support votes can be removed if they are not well-reasoned enough. The agreement of three users, including a sysop, is needed to remove a vote.</blockquote>
This does not, in any way, allow the supporter/opposer to respond to the action taken against his vote. My vote was removed overnight while I was at sleep, giving me no chance to react at all. That is not right. There should be a time window in which the voter is allowed to clarify their statements before it just gets removed while they are away. Especially if the vote was just a "per <other guy>" and the vote of "<other guy>" gets invalidated. {{proposal-link|Change rules for invalidating votes}}
{{proposal-link|Change rules for invalidating votes}}
 


'''Proposer:''' {{User|Cobold}}<br>
'''Proposer:''' {{User|Cobold}}<br>

Revision as of 18:13, February 15, 2010

Change rules for invalidating votes

Currently, the rules for removing support votes from unfeature nomination reads:

Similarly, not only oppose votes, but also support votes can be removed if they are not well-reasoned enough. The agreement of three users, including a sysop, is needed to remove a vote.

(more...)

Proposer: Cobold (talk)
Deadline: February 15, 2010, 17:00

Talk Page Proposals