Talk:MS-DOS: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (→‎Turn this article into a category: Should last two weeks, since it is a talk page proposal)
Line 11: Line 11:


'''Proposer''': {{User|rollerC}}<br>
'''Proposer''': {{User|rollerC}}<br>
'''Deadline''': August 6, 2018, 23:59 GMT
'''Deadline''': August 13, 2018, 23:59 GMT


===Support===
===Support===

Revision as of 19:22, July 30, 2018

Is this page worth keeping?

Question.svg This talk page or section has a conflict or a question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment.

I personally don't see any point in having a Mario Wiki page about the MS-DOS, and as was mentioned in the Discord earlier, it validates articles such as a Windows article to be created. rollerC (talk) 01:45, 30 July 2018 (EDT)

It's better as just a simple category. The current article is awfully detailed and off-topic. It seems like we don't have a category for this yet. Also, categorizing this as a Video Game system and putting it in the "Video Game Consoles and Add-ons" navigational template seems to be a bit of a stretch. Icon showing how many lives Mario has left. From Super Mario 64 DS. It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 15:26, 30 July 2018 (EDT)
Agreed. I do like the idea of having it as a category instead. rollerC (talk) 17:54, 30 July 2018 (EDT)

Article to category proposal

Proposal.svg This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment.

Current time: Friday, May 24, 2024, 09:45 GMT

Turn this article into a category

Essentially, the Games section would become: "List of Mario games released for the MS-DOS". Similarly, the Wiki could hold categories for Mario games released on Windows, etc.

Proposer: rollerC (talk)
Deadline: August 13, 2018, 23:59 GMT

Support

  1. rollerC (talk) As discussed before in both the Discord and the above talk section, this article is incredibly off-topic to the subject of Mario, and the only relevant information is the list of Mario games released for the MS-DOS. Bazooka Mario (talk) makes a good point that the information in the article would be much better served in a category page, rather than include the unnecessary clutter that is the information on the MS-DOS, which most users visiting the website are probably not looking for anyway.

Oppose

Comments

After this proposal is complete, I'll remove the unresolved conflict box. rollerC (talk) 18:59, 30 July 2018 (EDT)