Talk:Shitamachi Ninjō Gekijō: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:
:::::::::The burden of proof goes on the person who makes the initial claim in literally any court. Any you made the initial claim that it' real. You haven't provided any definitive proof. Also, I never said it had to be Sallataview. It could just be some random MS Paint'd-together images as "screenshots," which is the ''obvious'' way it could be faked, or a bootleg Super Famicon game with a few images on it. Also, you're belligerent. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 21:45, 11 January 2018 (EST)
:::::::::The burden of proof goes on the person who makes the initial claim in literally any court. Any you made the initial claim that it' real. You haven't provided any definitive proof. Also, I never said it had to be Sallataview. It could just be some random MS Paint'd-together images as "screenshots," which is the ''obvious'' way it could be faked, or a bootleg Super Famicon game with a few images on it. Also, you're belligerent. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 21:45, 11 January 2018 (EST)
::::::::::Just shut up. You're always trying to get on my nerves. I was trying to do a favour for the wiki and this is how you treat me. Thank you very much. I really appreciate it. If you don't like the page, stop looking at it. It doesn't involve you. You're just trying to provoke me as always. I've just about had it with your BS. It's not fake is multiple Japanese collectors know about it. It's not a bootleg. How about you just listen for once in your life and just accept the fact that this is real. You're clearly just jealous since you weren't the first to find it. I've even talked with multiple admins about creating this page and they gave me the green light to do so. [[User:Howzit]] 21:48, 11 January 2018 (EST)
::::::::::Just shut up. You're always trying to get on my nerves. I was trying to do a favour for the wiki and this is how you treat me. Thank you very much. I really appreciate it. If you don't like the page, stop looking at it. It doesn't involve you. You're just trying to provoke me as always. I've just about had it with your BS. It's not fake is multiple Japanese collectors know about it. It's not a bootleg. How about you just listen for once in your life and just accept the fact that this is real. You're clearly just jealous since you weren't the first to find it. I've even talked with multiple admins about creating this page and they gave me the green light to do so. [[User:Howzit]] 21:48, 11 January 2018 (EST)
:::::::::::Wow, such an epitome of maturity. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 21:49, 11 January 2018 (EST)
:::::::::::Wow, such an epitome of maturity. Anyways, the point still stands that this article sites ''nothing''. If you want meor anyone else, like the person who brought this up, to have any reason to believe you, cite ''something'' at least. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 21:49, 11 January 2018 (EST)


Before this escalates any further, I'm saying that Howzit hasn't given a reason to doubt him before. If this turns out to be a hoax, then it's one he doesn't know about himself. And a bootleg of a Satellaview game is impossible given the add-on's requirements. Given the nature of this "game", it is impossible to verify, so time will tell if this is something to worry about. Enough with the arguing back and forth, both of you, or you'll both receive consequences, as these confrontations of yours have gone on far enough. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 21:49, 11 January 2018 (EST)
Before this escalates any further, I'm saying that Howzit hasn't given a reason to doubt him before. If this turns out to be a hoax, then it's one he doesn't know about himself. And a bootleg of a Satellaview game is impossible given the add-on's requirements. Given the nature of this "game", it is impossible to verify, so time will tell if this is something to worry about. Enough with the arguing back and forth, both of you, or you'll both receive consequences, as these confrontations of yours have gone on far enough. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 21:49, 11 January 2018 (EST)

Revision as of 22:51, January 11, 2018

Question.svg This talk page or section has a conflict or a question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment.

The article cites no sources whatsoever. Why would someone believe what's written in it? -- -- KOOPA CON CARNE 18:51, 11 January 2018 (EST)

Because it's "administrator-approved," apparently. Though I didn't think there'd be anything worse than that manga page with Captain Syrup, but I guess I was wrong... Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 18:54, 11 January 2018 (EST)
It's traced from this tweet but that's it. -- -- KOOPA CON CARNE 19:09, 11 January 2018 (EST)
So basically there's absolutely nothing confirming this to be a Nintendo product from the screenshots (I don't see a copyright), and seemingly no known cartridges to check for a copyright, so it could be a bootleg, of which plenty exist, or completely made up. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 21:15, 11 January 2018 (EST)
I don't have the confirmation myself, but the user who made the article has confirmed that it's official. Hello, I'm Time Turner. 21:16, 11 January 2018 (EST)
That's not good enough. I don't trust shady orange shopkeepers, myself. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 21:17, 11 January 2018 (EST)
It is official. The rom is being passed around a small Japanese circle. So the ROM is lost. It makes no sense for a bootleg to be on the satellaview. It's impossible. Somebody would've had to hijack the station in order to send this out to players. I've spoken with other people who are very big on satellaview games and preservation. They have confirmed it to be real. Next time do your research and read everything properly before you make accusations that it's fake. User:Howzit 21:24, 11 January 2018 (EST)
Except there's nothing proving it's an actual Sallataview game. It seems so wildly out-of-touch with the other things on the system it honestly seems more like a hoax, what with the toys that can easily be found in a flea market and crude idea and menu graphics. I have been provided nothing that indicates this is anything more than a hoax, just a disgruntled person insulting me (again). Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 21:39, 11 January 2018 (EST)
Have you got proof that it's fake? You clearly don't know what you're talking about if you're calling it "sallataview" lol. Stay away from my page. User:Howzit 21:41, 11 January 2018 (EST)
The burden of proof goes on the person who makes the initial claim in literally any court. Any you made the initial claim that it' real. You haven't provided any definitive proof. Also, I never said it had to be Sallataview. It could just be some random MS Paint'd-together images as "screenshots," which is the obvious way it could be faked, or a bootleg Super Famicon game with a few images on it. Also, you're belligerent. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 21:45, 11 January 2018 (EST)
Just shut up. You're always trying to get on my nerves. I was trying to do a favour for the wiki and this is how you treat me. Thank you very much. I really appreciate it. If you don't like the page, stop looking at it. It doesn't involve you. You're just trying to provoke me as always. I've just about had it with your BS. It's not fake is multiple Japanese collectors know about it. It's not a bootleg. How about you just listen for once in your life and just accept the fact that this is real. You're clearly just jealous since you weren't the first to find it. I've even talked with multiple admins about creating this page and they gave me the green light to do so. User:Howzit 21:48, 11 January 2018 (EST)
Wow, such an epitome of maturity. Anyways, the point still stands that this article sites nothing. If you want meor anyone else, like the person who brought this up, to have any reason to believe you, cite something at least. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 21:49, 11 January 2018 (EST)

Before this escalates any further, I'm saying that Howzit hasn't given a reason to doubt him before. If this turns out to be a hoax, then it's one he doesn't know about himself. And a bootleg of a Satellaview game is impossible given the add-on's requirements. Given the nature of this "game", it is impossible to verify, so time will tell if this is something to worry about. Enough with the arguing back and forth, both of you, or you'll both receive consequences, as these confrontations of yours have gone on far enough. Alex95sig1.pngAlex95sig2.png 21:49, 11 January 2018 (EST)