MarioWiki talk:BJAODN/Mario (species): Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
== Luigi (species)? ==
== Luigi (species)? ==
:Is there a Luigi (species) article here? If not, we should create one, as he is important enough to have his own species (although they probably have already died out, because they stumbled into a Ghost House).[[User:M&L|M&L Just because you're in red doesn't mean you're strong. Have at you!]] 17:11, 6 February 2012 (EST)
:Is there a Luigi (species) article here? If not, we should create one, as he is important enough to have his own species (although they probably have already died out, because they stumbled into a Ghost House).[[User:M&L|M&L Just because you're in red doesn't mean you're strong. Have at you!]] 17:11, 6 February 2012 (EST)
::Well these article were articles that were actually made at one point and making a Luigi (species) article would be vandalism {{User|Raven Effect}}

Revision as of 18:12, February 6, 2012

This article makes me laugh my ass off Fly Guy 2

Commenting on BJAODN articles is strongly discouraged now, just so you know. Previous Nintendo logo (2006-2016): In 2006, the logo's color scheme was changed from red to gray and the registered symbol was made more smaller.64Fan (Discussion) 20:59, 5 October 2011 (EDT)

Luigi (species)?

Is there a Luigi (species) article here? If not, we should create one, as he is important enough to have his own species (although they probably have already died out, because they stumbled into a Ghost House).M&L Just because you're in red doesn't mean you're strong. Have at you! 17:11, 6 February 2012 (EST)
Well these article were articles that were actually made at one point and making a Luigi (species) article would be vandalism Raven Effect (talk)