Editing Talk:Socially Awkward Piranha Plant
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
:::::Bad Luck Goomba also has a narrative of a sort (it went on a summer beach vacation) and characterization most Goombas don't (it's more unlucky than the average goomba)--the literal only semantic difference we can think of is that his name is from a hashtag, whereas the Piranha Plant's name is from the actual post body. And to be honest, we don't exactly think a name originating from a tag and not the textual body when both are part of the post anyways really makes much of a difference. It doesn't really matter to us anyhow, seeing as we don't think ''either'' of them warrant bespoke articles to be fair---but we do wanna make it clear that the thread of logic behind this article wouldn't exactly rule out a Bad Luck Goomba article had it not been merged already. {{User:Camwoodstock/sig}} 16:12, January 17, 2024 (EST) | :::::Bad Luck Goomba also has a narrative of a sort (it went on a summer beach vacation) and characterization most Goombas don't (it's more unlucky than the average goomba)--the literal only semantic difference we can think of is that his name is from a hashtag, whereas the Piranha Plant's name is from the actual post body. And to be honest, we don't exactly think a name originating from a tag and not the textual body when both are part of the post anyways really makes much of a difference. It doesn't really matter to us anyhow, seeing as we don't think ''either'' of them warrant bespoke articles to be fair---but we do wanna make it clear that the thread of logic behind this article wouldn't exactly rule out a Bad Luck Goomba article had it not been merged already. {{User:Camwoodstock/sig}} 16:12, January 17, 2024 (EST) | ||
::::::The obvious course whether SAPP has or doesn't have a page of its own is to put "(Bad Luck) Goomba" on [[Goomba]]'s article similarly to what was done with the plant. {{User:Koopa con Carne/Sig}} 16:32, January 17, 2024 (EST) | ::::::The obvious course whether SAPP has or doesn't have a page of its own is to put "(Bad Luck) Goomba" on [[Goomba]]'s article similarly to what was done with the plant. {{User:Koopa con Carne/Sig}} 16:32, January 17, 2024 (EST) | ||
This may be outside the scope of this discussion, but after I added the article to [[MarioWiki:BJAODN/Characters]], [https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=MarioWiki%3ABJAODN%2FCharacters&curid=81105&diff=4116299&oldid=4116281 it was removed] with the reasoning that it's still on the mainspace, and the proposal itself didn't aim to put it in BJAODN. I understand this reasoning, but many users (including myself, though I didn't state it before) were adamant on adding this article to BJAODN. Should we add it back, replace it with a comment among the lines of "(''At one point, there was an article on this image macro.'')", or just leave it removed? [[User:SolemnStormcloud|SolemnStormcloud]] ([[User talk:SolemnStormcloud|talk]]) 14:36, January 17, 2024 (EST) | This may be outside the scope of this discussion, but after I added the article to [[MarioWiki:BJAODN/Characters]], [https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=MarioWiki%3ABJAODN%2FCharacters&curid=81105&diff=4116299&oldid=4116281 it was removed] with the reasoning that it's still on the mainspace, and the proposal itself didn't aim to put it in BJAODN. I understand this reasoning, but many users (including myself, though I didn't state it before) were adamant on adding this article to BJAODN. Should we add it back, replace it with a comment among the lines of "(''At one point, there was an article on this image macro.'')", or just leave it removed? [[User:SolemnStormcloud|SolemnStormcloud]] ([[User talk:SolemnStormcloud|talk]]) 14:36, January 17, 2024 (EST) |