44,447
edits
Talk:Tug o' War: Difference between revisions
let MarioWiki do what we set up, not let other wikis dictate what we do
(let MarioWiki do what we set up, not let other wikis dictate what we do) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
::::I don't think that's the problem, Fawful... {{User:Alex95/sig}} 01:03, 1 June 2016 (EDT) | ::::I don't think that's the problem, Fawful... {{User:Alex95/sig}} 01:03, 1 June 2016 (EDT) | ||
::::Who said there was a traffic problem? And like I said, LOTS of Wikis I've visited have acknowledged when a level or stage is exceptionally difficult. The Zelda Wiki does it, the GTA Wiki does it. What makes it so different here? I'm not venting my anger or giving tips or strategies. I'm giving common knowledge that anyone would bring up. If I was venting my anger, it would be a lot more blatant. And if I was offering tips or strategies, I'd put them in the appropriate section and list what you're actually supposed to ''do'' to get around it. If it doesn't count as trivia, then don't revert it. Put it in the appropriate section, or ''add'' an appropriate section if it doesn't exist yet. [[User:EldritchNexus|EldritchNexus]] ([[User talk:EldritchNexus|talk]]) 01:23, 1 June 2016 (EDT) | ::::Who said there was a traffic problem? And like I said, LOTS of Wikis I've visited have acknowledged when a level or stage is exceptionally difficult. The Zelda Wiki does it, the GTA Wiki does it. What makes it so different here? I'm not venting my anger or giving tips or strategies. I'm giving common knowledge that anyone would bring up. If I was venting my anger, it would be a lot more blatant. And if I was offering tips or strategies, I'd put them in the appropriate section and list what you're actually supposed to ''do'' to get around it. If it doesn't count as trivia, then don't revert it. Put it in the appropriate section, or ''add'' an appropriate section if it doesn't exist yet. [[User:EldritchNexus|EldritchNexus]] ([[User talk:EldritchNexus|talk]]) 01:23, 1 June 2016 (EDT) | ||
:::::Just because lots of wikis acknowledged the difficulty doesn't mean this wiki does. We follow our own rules and policies we set up, and we don't care how other wikis handle subjective information. As for the article, difficulty is mostly a subjective thing. Some players might find it difficult, others may not, some players play with different settings, others not. We're not going to go on a debate to state whether this minigame is easy or not, and collective opinion doesn't automatically mean it's the right or even the "superior" opinion. Just stating the facts is more professional that way, because those can't get argued with, whereas, stating the difficulty of the minigame ''can'' be argued and it would be a gigantic mess if we allow the debate of subjective opinions. It's better to leave all sorts of strategy off than on; we don't focus on it anyway, we only focus on providing the hard facts. And if someone else would make that edit, being ignorant of wiki policies, it would be quickly reverted like any other edit. This is just how wiki editors here work, who cares how many people add it back in because they don't care about wiki policies. This edit has no place here at all, and therefore, doesn't belong on this article anywhere. {{User:Baby Luigi/sig}} 01:32, 1 June 2016 (EDT) | |||