14,859
edits
Talk:Ridley: Difference between revisions
→Comments
| Line 104: | Line 104: | ||
:My test page has been expanded; [[User:Marioguy1/Test#Ridley|here's Ridley]] and [[User:Marioguy1/Test|here's Meta Ridley]]. So do you think that those are good articles? {{User|Marioguy1}} | :My test page has been expanded; [[User:Marioguy1/Test#Ridley|here's Ridley]] and [[User:Marioguy1/Test|here's Meta Ridley]]. So do you think that those are good articles? {{User|Marioguy1}} | ||
::Huh, looks better than [[Behemoth]] and [[Behemoth King]] that has been split. I wonder why we split it if Meta Ridley has a lot more differences to Ridley than Behemoth to Behemoth King. So I say we should split Ridley and Meta Ridley for consistency. My final opinion: I'm pretty fine with these articles. I see nothing wrong in having both as separate articles. {{User:BabyLuigiOnFire/sig}} | ::Huh, looks better than [[Behemoth]] and [[Behemoth King]] that has been split. I wonder why we split it if Meta Ridley has a lot more differences to Ridley than Behemoth to Behemoth King. So I say we should split Ridley and Meta Ridley for consistency. My final opinion: I'm pretty fine with these articles. I see nothing wrong in having both as separate articles. {{User:BabyLuigiOnFire/sig}} | ||
:::I think they both look great, but then again, I've been saying that from the beginning... {{User|Phoenix}} 02:41, 18 March 2011 (EDT) | |||