Talk:Coin bag: Difference between revisions

Big developments on the proposal front see comments
(Urgent question please answer!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
(Big developments on the proposal front see comments)
Line 3: Line 3:
== Split the ''[[Mario Party (series)|Mario Party]]'' Coin Bag from the ''[[Super Princess Peach]]'' Coin Bag ==
== Split the ''[[Mario Party (series)|Mario Party]]'' Coin Bag from the ''[[Super Princess Peach]]'' Coin Bag ==


{{SettledTPP}}
{{TPP}}
{{ProposalOutcome|passed|6-5-1-0|split only}}
 
I noticed Bazooka Mario posted a question above regarding this over a year ago, which never got answered, but brings up a good point. The ''Mario Party'' and ''Super Princess Peach'' Coin Bags are two different objects. One is small and acts as a collectible; the other is the opposite: a large, floating, interactable object, with the only thing in common being that they have [[coin]]s inside them. It's for this reason I think they should be split.
I noticed Bazooka Mario posted a question above regarding this over a year ago, which never got answered, but brings up a good point. The ''Mario Party'' and ''Super Princess Peach'' Coin Bags are two different objects. One is small and acts as a collectible; the other is the opposite: a large, floating, interactable object, with the only thing in common being that they have [[coin]]s inside them. It's for this reason I think they should be split.


Line 12: Line 12:


'''Proposer''': {{User|Mario jc}}<br>
'''Proposer''': {{User|Mario jc}}<br>
'''Deadline''': August 25, 2017, 23:59 GMT
'''Deadline''': <s>August 25, 2017, 23:59 GMT</s> September, 1, 2017, 23:59 GMT


===Split ''Mario Party'' and ''SPP'' info into separate articles===
===Split ''Mario Party'' and ''SPP'' info into separate articles===
Line 37: Line 37:
:If the ''MP'' version is merged with [[Money Bag]], the ''SPP'' version will be the only one left here. The only option that would result in the ''SPP'' variant ''not'' getting its own article is "merge all into one". {{User:7feetunder/sig}} 14:58, 11 August 2017 (EDT)
:If the ''MP'' version is merged with [[Money Bag]], the ''SPP'' version will be the only one left here. The only option that would result in the ''SPP'' variant ''not'' getting its own article is "merge all into one". {{User:7feetunder/sig}} 14:58, 11 August 2017 (EDT)
Shouldn't this proposal have been extended since it didn't pass by a margin of 3 votes? {{User|Chester Alan Arthur}}
Shouldn't this proposal have been extended since it didn't pass by a margin of 3 votes? {{User|Chester Alan Arthur}}
So after going over all the rules and discussion this with TT I've come to the conclusion that this proposal did not meet the criteria to pass. Rule 10 says that any proposal with more then 10 votes must pass by a majority of 3 votes which this one did not because the outcome was 6-5-1 that's 12 total votes. Now you could say that this proposal falls under rule 9 but it doesn't pass under rule 9 either because rule 9 requires a single option to have a majority of the vote which no option has since one side has 50% of the votes and the other sides have 50% of the total vote. Now you could argue that because so many voters are under different options it should fall under this proposal https://www.mariowiki.com/MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive_45#Change_rule_9_to_centre_on_voters_rather_than_votes but even if we apply that there are only 6 unique voters and they split 3-3. Under no criteria did this proposal pass and so it should be extended for another week.