39,656
edits
MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N2/Princess Daisy: Difference between revisions
MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N2/Princess Daisy (edit)
Revision as of 16:50, May 16, 2018
, 6 years agono edit summary
mNo edit summary |
|||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]=== | ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]=== | ||
{{ | {{fa-archive|unfeature=yes}} | ||
| | '''Princess Daisy''' became unfeatured at 11:55, 9 April 2014. | ||
==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ||
#{{User|Time Turner}} About a year ago, I made a [[MarioWiki:Featured Articles/Unfeature/N1/Princess Daisy|nomination]] to unfeature Daisy's article. Since then, the article has had a lot of work put into it and has been [[MarioWiki:Featured Articles/N2/Princess Daisy|refeatured]]. I commend everyone who pitched in to improve it, and the article does look better than I last saw it, but some of the flaws I brought up in the denomination haven't been settled, such as the sections that still lack images, or the "relationships" section that's still awkwardly written and grasping at straws. There are also a couple of areas that seem to be flawed: several of the sections covering games are rather short, and, though I understand that nothing more can really be said about them, they could be organized in a similar fashion to how the [[Princess Daisy#Mario Party series|Mario Party series]] is organized; [[Princess Daisy#Music|Music]] brings up several points of interest, such as how the song lyrics had flaws or that ''Save Me (With Your Charm)'' was sung by Daisy, but does not elaborate at all on these points, and would benefit greatly from some expansion; [[Princess_Daisy#Special_abilities|Special abilities]] goes into far more detail than is necessary for the section, and lists a lot of general aspects about Daisy rather than her genuine special abilities; [[Princess Daisy#Appearance|Appearance]] and [[Princess Daisy#Clothing|Clothing]] border on being straight from a novel ("sapphire-blue eyes and orange-ginger hair"?), and definitely needs to be rewritten. At this point, I've already outlined numerous problems with the article, problems that, in my opinion, need to be corrected for this article to be considered worthy of keeping its status as a featured article. | #{{User|Time Turner}} About a year ago, I made a [[MarioWiki:Featured Articles/Unfeature/N1/Princess Daisy|nomination]] to unfeature Daisy's article. Since then, the article has had a lot of work put into it and has been [[MarioWiki:Featured Articles/N2/Princess Daisy|refeatured]]. I commend everyone who pitched in to improve it, and the article does look better than I last saw it, but some of the flaws I brought up in the denomination haven't been settled, such as the sections that still lack images, or the "relationships" section that's still awkwardly written and grasping at straws. There are also a couple of areas that seem to be flawed: several of the sections covering games are rather short, and, though I understand that nothing more can really be said about them, they could be organized in a similar fashion to how the [[Princess Daisy#Mario Party series|Mario Party series]] is organized; [[Princess Daisy#Music|Music]] brings up several points of interest, such as how the song lyrics had flaws or that ''Save Me (With Your Charm)'' was sung by Daisy, but does not elaborate at all on these points, and would benefit greatly from some expansion; [[Princess_Daisy#Special_abilities|Special abilities]] goes into far more detail than is necessary for the section, and lists a lot of general aspects about Daisy rather than her genuine special abilities; [[Princess Daisy#Appearance|Appearance]] and [[Princess Daisy#Clothing|Clothing]] border on being straight from a novel ("sapphire-blue eyes and orange-ginger hair"?), and definitely needs to be rewritten. At this point, I've already outlined numerous problems with the article, problems that, in my opinion, need to be corrected for this article to be considered worthy of keeping its status as a featured article. | ||
| Line 16: | Line 14: | ||
==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ||
==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ==== | ==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ==== | ||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||