MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N2/Princess Daisy: Difference between revisions

m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
(21 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]===
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]===
{{UNFANOMSTAT
{{fa-archive|unfeature=yes}}
|nominated=19:48, 9 March 2014 (EDT)
'''Princess Daisy''' became unfeatured at 11:55, 9 April 2014.
}}
==== Remove Featured Article Status ====
==== Remove Featured Article Status ====
#{{User|Time Turner}} About a year ago, I made a [[MarioWiki:Featured Articles/Unfeature/N1/Princess Daisy|nomination]] to unfeature Daisy's article. Since then, the article has had a lot of work put into it and has been [[MarioWiki:Featured Articles/N2/Princess Daisy|refeatured]]. I commend everyone who pitched in to improve it, and the article does look better than I last saw it, but some of the flaws I brought up in the denomination haven't been settled, such as the sections that still lack images, or the "relationships" section that's still awkwardly written and grasping at straws. There are also a couple of areas that seem to be flawed: several of the sections covering games are rather short, and, though I understand that nothing more can really be said about them, they could be organized in a similar fashion to how the [[Princess Daisy#Mario Party series|Mario Party series]] is organized; [[Princess Daisy#Music|Music]] brings up several points of interest, such as how the song lyrics had flaws or that ''Save Me (With Your Charm)'' was sung by Daisy, but does not elaborate at all on these points, and would benefit greatly from some expansion; [[Princess_Daisy#Special_abilities|Special abilities]] goes into far more detail than is necessary for the section, and lists a lot of general aspects about Daisy rather than her genuine special abilities; [[Princess Daisy#Appearance|Appearance]] and [[Princess Daisy#Clothing|Clothing]] border on being straight from a novel ("sapphire-blue eyes and orange-ginger hair"?), and definitely needs to be rewritten. At this point, I've already outlined numerous problems with the article, problems that, in my opinion, need to be corrected for this article to be considered worthy of keeping its status as a featured article.
#{{User|Time Turner}} About a year ago, I made a [[MarioWiki:Featured Articles/Unfeature/N1/Princess Daisy|nomination]] to unfeature Daisy's article. Since then, the article has had a lot of work put into it and has been [[MarioWiki:Featured Articles/N2/Princess Daisy|refeatured]]. I commend everyone who pitched in to improve it, and the article does look better than I last saw it, but some of the flaws I brought up in the denomination haven't been settled, such as the sections that still lack images, or the "relationships" section that's still awkwardly written and grasping at straws. There are also a couple of areas that seem to be flawed: several of the sections covering games are rather short, and, though I understand that nothing more can really be said about them, they could be organized in a similar fashion to how the [[Princess Daisy#Mario Party series|Mario Party series]] is organized; [[Princess Daisy#Music|Music]] brings up several points of interest, such as how the song lyrics had flaws or that ''Save Me (With Your Charm)'' was sung by Daisy, but does not elaborate at all on these points, and would benefit greatly from some expansion; [[Princess_Daisy#Special_abilities|Special abilities]] goes into far more detail than is necessary for the section, and lists a lot of general aspects about Daisy rather than her genuine special abilities; [[Princess Daisy#Appearance|Appearance]] and [[Princess Daisy#Clothing|Clothing]] border on being straight from a novel ("sapphire-blue eyes and orange-ginger hair"?), and definitely needs to be rewritten. At this point, I've already outlined numerous problems with the article, problems that, in my opinion, need to be corrected for this article to be considered worthy of keeping its status as a featured article.
#{{User|Baby Luigi}} <s>I've always wondered why the hell her clothing and sports wear section isn't merged with the appearance (and renamed to physical description), like any other normal character article</s><sub>I cleaned it up so it looks better</sub>. Per Time Turner, by the way.
#{{User|Baby Luigi}} <s>I've always wondered why the hell her clothing and sports wear section isn't merged with the appearance (and renamed to physical description), like any other normal character article</s><sub>I cleaned it up so it looks better</sub>. Per Time Turner, by the way.
#<s>{{User|Ashley and Red}} I refeatured it last time. I agrre with you. I will try to fix the clothing/abilities sections.</s>
#{{User|Marshal Dan Troop}} Per Time Turner
#{{User|Marshal Dan Troop}} Per Time Turner
#{{User|Mario}} Some sections require expansion, such as ''Mario Strikers Charged'', ''Mario Baseball'' games, ''Mario Power Tennis'', and ''Nintendo Comics System'' (needs to specify on WHICH volume). The "general information" section is cluttered with images and is padded with mumbo jumbo description. The "relationships" section also needs to be rearranged and rewritten. I can't find the f***ing guideline for the relationship section, but the section obviously doesn't adhere. Also, Time Turner's wall of td;lr has reason.
#{{User|Mario}} Some sections require expansion, such as ''Mario Strikers Charged'', ''Mario Baseball'' games, ''Mario Power Tennis'', and ''Nintendo Comics System'' (needs to specify on WHICH volume). The "general information" section is cluttered with images and is padded with mumbo jumbo description. The "relationships" section also needs to be rearranged and rewritten. I can't find the f***ing guideline for the relationship section, but the section obviously doesn't adhere. Also, Time Turner's wall of td;lr has reason.
Line 13: Line 11:
#{{User|Icemario}} Per Time Turner.
#{{User|Icemario}} Per Time Turner.
#{{User|CoolYoshi27}} The only reason it got featured was because of all the Daisy fans that really don't care about the article, it seems like.
#{{User|CoolYoshi27}} The only reason it got featured was because of all the Daisy fans that really don't care about the article, it seems like.
#{{User|Fandro}} Per all.


==== Keep Featured Article Status ====
==== Keep Featured Article Status ====
#{{User|Ashley and Red}} Looks OK for me. About the ''Mario Party'' sections fashion: This isn't  100% needed, even it looks Good.


==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ====
==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ====
'''Ashley and Red'''
#{{User|Time Turner}} There still happen to be a lot of problems with the article. Even if it passes your approval barrier, it's certainly not gonna pass the FA standards.


==== Comments ====
==== Comments ====
Line 73: Line 69:
Any particular reason Daisy requires a separate section for her "special" abilities? {{User|Baby Luigi}}
Any particular reason Daisy requires a separate section for her "special" abilities? {{User|Baby Luigi}}
::Isn't better do the sections like it was (before my edits). Being honest, I think that the Mario Party sections are...a mess. {{User|Ashley and Red}}
::Isn't better do the sections like it was (before my edits). Being honest, I think that the Mario Party sections are...a mess. {{User|Ashley and Red}}
Why is it her headers signifying separate games and sections have been removed? Most all other character articles still have this. [[User:UhHuhAlrightDaisy|UhHuhAlrightDaisy]] ([[User talk:UhHuhAlrightDaisy|talk]]) 20:01, 12 March 2014 (EDT)
39,656

edits