MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Kart: Difference between revisions

→‎Comments: Removing redundant category
No edit summary
(→‎Comments: Removing redundant category)
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]===
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]===
{{UNFANOMSTAT
{{UNFANOMFAIL
|nominated=<!--Sign with FIVE tildes(~) here to put the exact date of the nomination. -->
|nominated=20:16, 22 July 2014
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last opposet  by copying it from the history of the page.-->
|lastedit=10:35, 23 June, 2014
}}
}}
==== Remove Featured Article Status ====
==== Remove Featured Article Status ====
# {{User|Joseph}}It is much to the series' but I don't think it will be good enough to become featured.
 
==== Keep Featured Article Status ====
==== Keep Featured Article Status ====
#{{User|Randombob-omb4761}} Why? It looks fine.
#{{User|Randombob-omb4761}} Why? It looks fine.
#{{User|Baby Luigi}} Can you STOP making UNFA's because they're "important" to the Mario series? [http://www.mariowiki.com/MarioWiki:Featured_Articles#Featured_Article_standards WHERE in the rules or ANYWHERE does it say "this article MUST be about an important item"???]
#{{User|Baby Luigi}} Can you STOP making UNFA's because they're "important" to the Mario series? [http://www.mariowiki.com/MarioWiki:Featured_Articles#Featured_Article_standards WHERE in the rules or ANYWHERE does it say "this article MUST be about an important item"???]
#{{User|Tails777}} I don't see anything wrong with the article so it can stay featured.


==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ====
==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ====


==== Comments ====
==== Comments ====
The point of unfeaturing nominations is to point out fundamental flaws in the article's content (writing style, presentation, completeness, images). Notability can be a valid argument, but if the subject isn't notable, such article wouldn't exist anyway. Also, you should specify how this article "isn't good enough". Is it poorly written? Does it look cluttered? Is the information outdated? Is there reasonable coverage? Are there any improvement templates? Those are the basic questions you have to ask first before making any sort of nomination here. {{User:Mario/sig}} 21:25, 22 July 2014 (EDT)
Okay' okay' you guys made me do this. I have no choice. {{User:Joseph/sig}}
39,656

edits