MarioWiki:Featured articles/N2/Paper Mario: Difference between revisions

m
(I really think we should bypass the rules for this and renominate it again once it fails.)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]===
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]===
{{FANOMSTAT
{{FANOMFAIL
|nominated=12:26, 1 January 2017 (EST)
|nominated=12:26, 1 January 2017 (EST)
|passed=
|lastedit=17:26, 2 March 2017 (EST)
|nosupport=false
}}
}}
==== Support ====
==== Support ====
Line 12: Line 13:
#{{User|Supermariofan67}} Ok looks good now. Per Alex95
#{{User|Supermariofan67}} Ok looks good now. Per Alex95
#{{User|Baby Luigi}} Per all.
#{{User|Baby Luigi}} Per all.
#{{User|Turboo}} - per all
#{{User|Lord Bowser}} Per all.
#{{User|Toadette the Achiever}} The original proposer did not completely understand how the FA process works <small>(and, on a side note, is [https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=&page=MarioMario456&year=&month=-1&tagfilter=&subtype= currently blocked])</small>, which was why I originally opposed. However, the fact that Gabumon decided to improve the article (taking into account the outdated rewrite template) has made me change my vote. The article looks much better than it did a few weeks ago.
#{{User|Luigi 64DD}} Now that it has been fixed, per all.


==== Oppose ====
==== Oppose ====
#{{User|Luigi 64DD}} Per all.
#{{User|Toadette the Achiever}} Per all. Length does not always guarantee good writing.
#{{User|Boo4761}} First of all, there is a rewrite template on the top, second, Article size has nothing to do with its quality. Lastly, this article is largely incomplete and we are still working on the issues that got it unfeatured. You have clearly never read the guidelines for nominating articles, can you please read it in the future?


==== Removal of opposes ====
==== Removal of opposes ====
'''Toadette the Achiever'''
#{{User|Gabumon}} - The quality of writing is acceptable.
#{{User|Baby Luigi}} Per Edo.
'''Boo4761'''
#{{User|Gabumon}} - See Alex95 and Toadette the Achiever.
#{{User|Baby Luigi}} Per Edo.


==== Comments ====
==== Comments ====
Line 34: Line 29:


Sorry for going the unclassy route with calling for the removal of oppose votes. I'd prefer a more discussion-based approach, but time is running out. If you read this, please re-evaluate the circumstances of this article and consider removing your oppose votes yourselves. - {{User|Gabumon}}
Sorry for going the unclassy route with calling for the removal of oppose votes. I'd prefer a more discussion-based approach, but time is running out. If you read this, please re-evaluate the circumstances of this article and consider removing your oppose votes yourselves. - {{User|Gabumon}}
Could this nomination still pass? It met the requirements for support votes and removal of oppose votes before the nomination expired. The only thing we are waiting for is the 24-hour wait time for the removal of opposes. --{{User:Supermariofan67/sig}} 20:36, 2 March 2017 (EST)