10,285
edits
(I really think we should bypass the rules for this and renominate it again once it fails.) |
m (Gabumon moved page MarioWiki:Featured articles/N/Paper Mario to MarioWiki:Featured articles/N2/Paper Mario) |
||
(8 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== | ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== | ||
{{ | {{FANOMFAIL | ||
|nominated=12:26, 1 January 2017 (EST) | |nominated=12:26, 1 January 2017 (EST) | ||
| | |lastedit=17:26, 2 March 2017 (EST) | ||
|nosupport=false | |||
}} | }} | ||
==== Support ==== | ==== Support ==== | ||
Line 12: | Line 13: | ||
#{{User|Supermariofan67}} Ok looks good now. Per Alex95 | #{{User|Supermariofan67}} Ok looks good now. Per Alex95 | ||
#{{User|Baby Luigi}} Per all. | #{{User|Baby Luigi}} Per all. | ||
#{{User|Turboo}} - per all | |||
#{{User|Lord Bowser}} Per all. | |||
#{{User|Toadette the Achiever}} The original proposer did not completely understand how the FA process works <small>(and, on a side note, is [https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=&page=MarioMario456&year=&month=-1&tagfilter=&subtype= currently blocked])</small>, which was why I originally opposed. However, the fact that Gabumon decided to improve the article (taking into account the outdated rewrite template) has made me change my vote. The article looks much better than it did a few weeks ago. | |||
#{{User|Luigi 64DD}} Now that it has been fixed, per all. | |||
==== Oppose ==== | ==== Oppose ==== | ||
==== Removal of opposes ==== | ==== Removal of opposes ==== | ||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
Line 34: | Line 29: | ||
Sorry for going the unclassy route with calling for the removal of oppose votes. I'd prefer a more discussion-based approach, but time is running out. If you read this, please re-evaluate the circumstances of this article and consider removing your oppose votes yourselves. - {{User|Gabumon}} | Sorry for going the unclassy route with calling for the removal of oppose votes. I'd prefer a more discussion-based approach, but time is running out. If you read this, please re-evaluate the circumstances of this article and consider removing your oppose votes yourselves. - {{User|Gabumon}} | ||
Could this nomination still pass? It met the requirements for support votes and removal of oppose votes before the nomination expired. The only thing we are waiting for is the 24-hour wait time for the removal of opposes. --{{User:Supermariofan67/sig}} 20:36, 2 March 2017 (EST) |