User talk:Time Turner/Archive 9: Difference between revisions

→‎RE: Trivia: new section
(→‎RE: Trivia: new section)
Line 321: Line 321:


Just letting you know, your proposal to unfeature Mario Party 9 ended a long time ago. I don't mean to sound rude if I came off as rude. [[User:Marioguy|Marioguy]] ([[User talk:Marioguy|talk]]) 18:19, 14 August 2017 (EDT)
Just letting you know, your proposal to unfeature Mario Party 9 ended a long time ago. I don't mean to sound rude if I came off as rude. [[User:Marioguy|Marioguy]] ([[User talk:Marioguy|talk]]) 18:19, 14 August 2017 (EDT)
== RE: Trivia ==
I take your point, and obviously no, that's more a trivia point. However, in the case of Snowman Doll, I feel the first point was fine in the introduction of the article. Reading it, for me, it didn't feel tacked on, as for the other point, reading it again I don't even feel it qualifies for trivia. Generically named item shares name with other generically named item doesn't feel right to me. {{User|Yoshi876}}