368
edits
(→Delete) |
(Proposal vote.) |
||
Line 139: | Line 139: | ||
#{{User|Magikrazy}} This proposal again? Oy vey. | #{{User|Magikrazy}} This proposal again? Oy vey. | ||
#{{User|Mario7}} It is what is is. Just because the name of this article isn't great, we shouldn't delete it. According to this logic, if there was a new character called "Pee," there should not be an article created for the character. This is a wiki (with the '''goal being to provide information'''), and we are not going to take away an article because of its name. Per all. | #{{User|Mario7}} It is what is is. Just because the name of this article isn't great, we shouldn't delete it. According to this logic, if there was a new character called "Pee," there should not be an article created for the character. This is a wiki (with the '''goal being to provide information'''), and we are not going to take away an article because of its name. Per all. | ||
#{{User|Young Master Luma}} Per old proposal, mostly. One possible solution would be a rewrite where insignificant appearances take up less space than slightly more important ones - see my comment. | |||
===Comments=== | ===Comments=== | ||
Line 169: | Line 170: | ||
:I'd assume that it just shows up for sight gags and funny background events. Nothing really major. {{User:Time Turner/sig}} | :I'd assume that it just shows up for sight gags and funny background events. Nothing really major. {{User:Time Turner/sig}} | ||
::Yeah, it does. {{User:Mario/sig}} 13:58, 4 March 2014 (EST) | ::Yeah, it does. {{User:Mario/sig}} 13:58, 4 March 2014 (EST) | ||
General consensus seems to be that the generic things (poop making insignificant appearances game mechanically or story-wise) take the back seat compared to Arty Wario's usage of it. One possible solution would be re-writing the article to focus more on just that, wouldn't it? The other appearances could be formatted as notes, or as smaller entries in a dedicated "appearances" section. {{User:Young Master Luma/sig}} 23:59, 4 March 2014 (EST) |
edits