Talk:Poop: Difference between revisions

645 bytes added ,  10 years ago
Proposal vote.
(Proposal vote.)
Line 139: Line 139:
#{{User|Magikrazy}} This proposal again? Oy vey.
#{{User|Magikrazy}} This proposal again? Oy vey.
#{{User|Mario7}} It is what is is. Just because the name of this article isn't great, we shouldn't delete it. According to this logic, if there was a new character called "Pee," there should not be an article created for the character. This is a wiki (with the '''goal being to provide information'''), and we are not going to take away an article because of its name. Per all.
#{{User|Mario7}} It is what is is. Just because the name of this article isn't great, we shouldn't delete it. According to this logic, if there was a new character called "Pee," there should not be an article created for the character. This is a wiki (with the '''goal being to provide information'''), and we are not going to take away an article because of its name. Per all.
#{{User|Young Master Luma}} Per old proposal, mostly. One possible solution would be a rewrite where insignificant appearances take up less space than slightly more important ones - see my comment.


===Comments===
===Comments===
Line 169: Line 170:
:I'd assume that it just shows up for sight gags and funny background events. Nothing really major. {{User:Time Turner/sig}}
:I'd assume that it just shows up for sight gags and funny background events. Nothing really major. {{User:Time Turner/sig}}
::Yeah, it does. {{User:Mario/sig}} 13:58, 4 March 2014 (EST)
::Yeah, it does. {{User:Mario/sig}} 13:58, 4 March 2014 (EST)
General consensus seems to be that the generic things (poop making insignificant appearances game mechanically or story-wise) take the back seat compared to Arty Wario's usage of it. One possible solution would be re-writing the article to focus more on just that, wouldn't it? The other appearances could be formatted as notes, or as smaller entries in a dedicated "appearances" section. {{User:Young Master Luma/sig}} 23:59, 4 March 2014 (EST)