3,568
edits
Talk:Ridley: Difference between revisions
→Comments
(Comment.) |
|||
| Line 115: | Line 115: | ||
Why? {{User|Phoenix}} 00:47, 23 March 2011 (EDT) | Why? {{User|Phoenix}} 00:47, 23 March 2011 (EDT) | ||
:I think what Zero said is that your argument is that they are separate entities, and that has been disproved, so the entire proposal is invalid. I want a split, just for different reasons, mostly because the test article looks ''much'' better than the one we have now. [[User Talk:Bop1996|Geekiness is an end, not a means -]] [[User:Bop1996|Bop1996]] 08:21, 23 March 2011 (EDT) | :I think what Zero said is that your argument is that they are separate entities, and that has been disproved, so the entire proposal is invalid. I want a split, just for different reasons, mostly because the test article looks ''much'' better than the one we have now. [[User Talk:Bop1996|Geekiness is an end, not a means -]] [[User:Bop1996|Bop1996]] 08:21, 23 March 2011 (EDT) | ||
I am Zero! ^^ Yep, that's what I mean, Meta Ridley is a cybernetically enhance version of Ridley, but your argument says otherwise and the examples you gave are invalid. Zero signing out. Zero signing out. {{User|Zero777}} | |||