10,285
edits
User talk:Grandy02/Archive 3: Difference between revisions
→Re: Wario Land II FA
SixFaceSal (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 99: | Line 99: | ||
== Wario bosses == | == Wario bosses == | ||
I made stubs for the Wario bosses like you asked, but someone else said Knife would probably delete them. If it comes to that, could you talk him out of it? [[User:SixFaceSal|SixFaceSal]] 21:11, 29 December 2009 (EST) | I made stubs for the Wario bosses like you asked, but someone else said Knife would probably delete them. If it comes to that, could you talk him out of it? [[User:SixFaceSal|SixFaceSal]] 21:11, 29 December 2009 (EST) | ||
==Re: Wario Land II FA== | |||
That's scary. I was thinking about EXACTLY the same a little earlier today (really). Oh, and there is no need to tale a back seat. The work and effort you put into that article is definitely as hard as the amount I put in it. :3 | |||
As for the actual question: I would love to see the Wario Land II article featured, and it is definitely on its way to FA status. However, there are still some minor things left that need to be done. I have to clean up some of the link-mess I made back then when I was new and unexperienced, and a few red links need to become blue. Once this is done, the article should be able to make the cut :3 | |||
What was it you wanted to talk about with me? - {{User:Edofenrir/sig}} 15:36, 30 December 2009 (EST) | |||